512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29221835)
1. Impact of surgical approach and patient factors on Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey scoring in gynecologic surgery.
Wallace S; Hanson KT; Dowdy SC; Habermann EB
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jan; 148(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 29221835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of length of stay on HCAHPS scores following lumbar spine surgery.
Smith GA; Chirieleison S; Levin J; Atli K; Winkelman R; Tanenbaum JE; Mroz T; Steinmetz M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 May; 31(3):366-371. PubMed ID: 31151093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of spine disease, relative to cranial disease, on perception of health and care experience: an analysis of 1484 patients in a tertiary center.
Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Ubl DS; Hanson KT; Krauss WE; Meyer FB; Spinner RJ; Habermann EB; Bydon M
J Neurosurg; 2018 Dec; 129(6):1630-1640. PubMed ID: 29372876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Emergency department visits after lumbar spine surgery are associated with lower Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores.
Levin JM; Winkelman RD; Smith GA; Tanenbaum JE; Xiao R; Mroz TE; Steinmetz MP
Spine J; 2018 Feb; 18(2):226-233. PubMed ID: 28739479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Hospital Case Mix on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Star Scores: Are All Stars the Same?
Thiels CA; Hanson KT; Yost KJ; Zielinski MD; Habermann EB; Cima RR
Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):666-73. PubMed ID: 27355268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Achieving a 5-star rating: Analysis of Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores among patients undergoing elective colorectal operations.
Thiels CA; Hanson KT; Yost KJ; Mathis KL; Cima RR; Zielinski MD; Habermann EB
Surgery; 2016 Oct; 160(4):902-914. PubMed ID: 27475815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-related Factors and Perioperative Outcomes Are Associated with Self-Reported Hospital Rating after Spine Surgery.
Mets EJ; Mercier MR; Hilibrand AS; Scott MC; Varthi AG; Grauer JN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Mar; 478(3):643-652. PubMed ID: 31389897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Retrospective and comparative study with laparotomy and laparoscopy].
Farache C; Alonso S; Ferrer Marsollier C; Masia F; de Tayrac R; Triopon G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Jun; 41(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 22542372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores and gynecologic oncology surgical outcomes.
Dottino JA; He W; Sun CC; Zhao H; Fu S; Lu KH; Meyer LA
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):405-410. PubMed ID: 31208738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The association between the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey and real-world clinical outcomes in lumbar spine surgery.
Levin JM; Winkelman RD; Smith GA; Tanenbaum J; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Steinmetz MP
Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1586-1593. PubMed ID: 28495242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Learning Needs of Women Who Undergo Robotic Versus Open Gynecologic Surgery.
Kurt G; Loerzel VW; Hines RB; Tavasci K; Galura S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2018 Jul; 47(4):490-497. PubMed ID: 29750905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology: seven years of experience at a single institution.
Moulton L; Jernigan AM; Carr C; Freeman L; Escobar PF; Michener CM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):610.e1-610.e8. PubMed ID: 28619688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective Cohort Study to Assess Outcomes, Cost-Effectiveness, and Patient Satisfaction in Primary Vaginal Ovarian Cystectomy versus the Laparoscopic Approach.
Yoong W; Fadel MG; Walker S; Williams S; Subba B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 26515896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic surgical staging in women with early stage epithelial ovarian cancer performed by recently certified gynecologic oncologists.
Minig L; Saadi J; Patrono MG; Giavedoni ME; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Perrotta M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():94-100. PubMed ID: 27086268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of patient satisfaction and survey participation after spine surgery: a retrospective review of 17,853 consecutive spinal patients from a single academic institution. Part 2: HCAHPS.
Hopkins BS; Patel MR; Yamaguchi JT; Cloney MB; Dahdaleh NS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Jan; 30(3):389-396. PubMed ID: 30611139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic review of robotic surgery in gynecology: robotic techniques compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Gala RB; Margulies R; Steinberg A; Murphy M; Lukban J; Jeppson P; Aschkenazi S; Olivera C; South M; Lowenstein L; Schaffer J; Balk EM; Sung V;
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 24295923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The clinical experience of robot-assisted surgery in gynecologic cancer.
Li XL; Du DF; Jiang H
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Apr; 26(2):119-123. PubMed ID: 27667447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Initial experience in the laparoscopic treatment of benign and malignant gynaecological diseases in the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad in Oaxaca].
Vásquez-Ciriaco S; Isla-Ortiz D; Palomeque-Lopez A; García-Espinoza JA; Jarquín-Arremilla A; Lechuga-García NA
Cir Cir; 2017; 85(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 27320647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches.
Martino MA; Berger EA; McFetridge JT; Shubella J; Gosciniak G; Wejkszner T; Kainz GF; Patriarco J; Thomas MB; Boulay R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 24513969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
