191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29221896)
1. Correlative imaging reveals physiochemical heterogeneity of microcalcifications in human breast carcinomas.
Kunitake JAMR; Choi S; Nguyen KX; Lee MM; He F; Sudilovsky D; Morris PG; Jochelson MS; Hudis CA; Muller DA; Fratzl P; Fischbach C; Masic A; Estroff LA
J Struct Biol; 2018 Apr; 202(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 29221896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity of breast MRI for ductal carcinoma in situ appearing as microcalcifications only on mammography.
Rinaldi P; Buccheri C; Giuliani M; Bufi E; Romani M; Patrolecco F; Belli P; Bonomo L
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1207-1212. PubMed ID: 27618803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can positron emission mammography help to identify clinically significant breast cancer in women with suspicious calcifications on mammography?
Bitencourt AG; Lima EN; Macedo BR; Conrado JL; Marques EF; Chojniak R
Eur Radiol; 2017 May; 27(5):1893-1900. PubMed ID: 27585658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sonographic findings of high-grade and non-high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Park JS; Park YM; Kim EK; Kim SJ; Han SS; Lee SJ; In HS; Ryu JH
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1687-97. PubMed ID: 21098839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
Holland R; Hendriks JH
Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast MRI as a Problem-solving Study in the Evaluation of BI-RADS Categories 3 and 4 Microcalcifications: Is it Worth Performing?
Shimauchi A; Machida Y; Maeda I; Fukuma E; Hoshi K; Tozaki M
Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):288-296. PubMed ID: 29191685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound Demonstration of Mammographically Detected Microcalcifications in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ of the Breast.
Nagashima T; Hashimoto H; Oshida K; Nakano S; Tanabe N; Nikaido T; Koda K; Miyazaki M
Breast Cancer; 2005; 12(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 16110292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-resolution 3D micro-CT imaging of breast microcalcifications: a preliminary analysis.
Willekens I; Van de Casteele E; Buls N; Temmermans F; Jansen B; Deklerck R; de Mey J
BMC Cancer; 2014 Jan; 14():9. PubMed ID: 24393444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Non-palpable breast carcinomas: correlation of mammographically detected malignant-appearing microcalcifications and molecular prognostic factors.
Karamouzis MV; Likaki-Karatza E; Ravazoula P; Badra FA; Koukouras D; Tzorakoleftherakis E; Papavassiliou AG; Kalofonos HP
Int J Cancer; 2002 Nov; 102(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 12353238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases.
Farshid G; Sullivan T; Downey P; Gill PG; Pieterse S
Br J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 105(11):1669-75. PubMed ID: 22052156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the extent of microcalcifications to predict the size of a ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison between tomosynthesis and conventional mammography.
Berger N; Schwizer SD; Varga Z; Rageth C; Frauenfelder T; Boss A
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1269-1273. PubMed ID: 27677056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.
Stehouwer BL; Merckel LG; Verkooijen HM; Peters NH; Mann RM; Duvivier KM; Mali WP; Peeters PH; Veldhuis WB; van den Bosch MA
Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 24078055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging findings for response evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ploumen RAW; de Mooij CM; Gommers S; Keymeulen KBMI; Smidt ML; van Nijnatten TJA
Eur Radiol; 2023 Aug; 33(8):5423-5435. PubMed ID: 37020070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What is the predictor for invasion in non-palpable breast cancer with microcalcifications?
Nishimura S; Takahashi K; Gomi N; Tada K; Makita M; Tada T; Iwase T; Yoshimoto M; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G; Kasumi F
Breast Cancer; 2004; 11(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 14718793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-palpable breast carcinomas: correlation of mammographically detected malignant-appearing microcalcifications and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family expression.
Badra FA; Karamouzis MV; Ravazoula P; Likaki-Karatza E; Tzorakoleftherakis E; Koukouras D; Iconomou G; Xiros N; Siablis D; Papavassiliou AG; Kalofonos HP
Cancer Lett; 2006 Nov; 244(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 16517064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided heterogeneity analysis in breast MR imaging assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ: Correlating histologic grade and receptor status.
Chou SS; Gombos EC; Chikarmane SA; Giess CS; Jayender J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1748-1759. PubMed ID: 28371110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neuroendocrine ductal carcinoma in situ, comedo type, of the breast detected by screening mammography: a potentially pre-invasive counterpart of high grade neuroendocrine tumours.
Kawasaki T; Inoue A; Mochizuki K; Inoue S; Nakazawa T; Kondo T; Yamane T; Niu D; Inoue M; Maruyama T; Oishi N; Katoh R
Pathology; 2012 Apr; 44(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 22437750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
