278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29221959)
1. Robotically-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Reasons for partial manual assistance or manual conversion.
Harrison J; Ang L; Naghi J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Patel MP; Reeves RR; Mahmud E
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jul; 19(5 Pt A):526-531. PubMed ID: 29221959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Mahmud E; Naghi J; Ang L; Harrison J; Behnamfar O; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jul; 10(13):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 28683937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report.
Smitson CC; Ang L; Pourdjabbar A; Reeves R; Patel M; Mahmud E
J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 30(4):152-156. PubMed ID: 29335386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. First-in-human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis.
Mahmud E; Dominguez A; Bahadorani J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 88(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 27189238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study.
Weisz G; Metzger DC; Caputo RP; Delgado JA; Marshall JJ; Vetrovec GW; Reisman M; Waksman R; Granada JF; Novack V; Moses JW; Carrozza JP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 61(15):1596-600. PubMed ID: 23500318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Successful introduction of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention system into Japanese clinical practice: a first-year survey at single center.
Kagiyama K; Mitsutake Y; Ueno T; Sakai S; Nakamura T; Yamaji K; Ishimatsu T; Sasaki M; Chibana H; Itaya N; Sasaki KI; Fukumoto Y
Heart Vessels; 2021 Jul; 36(7):955-964. PubMed ID: 33502572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system.
Granada JF; Delgado JA; Uribe MP; Fernandez A; Blanco G; Leon MB; Weisz G
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Apr; 4(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 21511227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-Assisted PCI: The Future of Coronary Intervention?
Stevenson A; Kirresh A; Ahmad M; Candilio L
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Feb; 35():161-168. PubMed ID: 33867293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Establishing a robotic-assisted PCI program: experiences at a large tertiary referral center.
Brunner FJ; Waldeyer C; Zengin-Sahm E; Kondziella C; Schrage B; Clemmensen P; Westermann D; Blankenberg S; Seiffert M
Heart Vessels; 2022 Oct; 37(10):1669-1678. PubMed ID: 35487996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: experience in Switzerland.
Häner JD; Räber L; Moro C; Losdat S; Windecker S
Front Cardiovasc Med; 2023; 10():1294930. PubMed ID: 38116535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of Robotically Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Allencherril J; Hyman D; Loya A; Jneid H; Alam M
J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 31(8):199-203. PubMed ID: 31088991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the R-One robotic system for percutaneous coronary intervention: the R-EVOLUTION study.
Durand E; Sabatier R; Smits PC; Verheye S; Pereira B; Fajadet J
EuroIntervention; 2023 Apr; 18(16):e1339-e1347. PubMed ID: 36602883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. First Experience of Robotic-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Japan.
Kagiyama K; Ueno T; Mitsutake Y; Yamaji K; Ishimatsu T; Sasaki KI; Fukumoto Y
Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 58(23):3415-3419. PubMed ID: 31366804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complication during robotic-PCI: Iatrogenic guiding catheter dissection.
Khokhar AA; Zelias A; Zlahoda-Huzior A; Dudek D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Apr; 99(5):1526-1528. PubMed ID: 35094475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: current evidence, practical aspects and future perspectives].
Toselli M; Nerla R; Ruggero R; Chandra K; Sbarzaglia P; Oshoala K; Margheri M; Giannini F; Castriota F
G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2021 Dec; 22(12 Suppl 2):16-22. PubMed ID: 35343486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotically performed excimer laser coronary atherectomy: Proof of feasibility.
Almasoud A; Walters D; Mahmud E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 92(4):713-716. PubMed ID: 29521479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complex robotic compared to manual coronary interventions: 6- and 12-month outcomes.
Walters D; Reeves RR; Patel M; Naghi J; Ang L; Mahmud E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Mar; 93(4):613-617. PubMed ID: 30456889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementation of Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Into a High-Risk PCI Program.
Chitturi KR; Kanake S; Nguyen T; Loc B; Baden K; Bavishi C; Kumar A; Liu Z; Chan A; Karuparthi PR; Hirai T
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Oct; 43():115-119. PubMed ID: 35610138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experience and complications associated with use of guide extension catheters in percutaneous coronary intervention.
Waterbury TM; Sorajja P; Bell MR; Lennon RJ; Mathew V; Singh M; Sandhu GS; Gulati R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Dec; 88(7):1057-1065. PubMed ID: 26698371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Longitudinal Geographic Miss (LGM) in Robotic Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
Bezerra HG; Mehanna E; W Vetrovec G; A Costa M; Weisz G
J Interv Cardiol; 2015 Oct; 28(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 26489972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
