173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29222677)
1. Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population.
Barrett T; McLean M; Priest AN; Lawrence EM; Patterson AJ; Koo BC; Patterson I; Warren AY; Doble A; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Gallagher FA
Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3141-3150. PubMed ID: 29222677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population.
Ding K; Yao Y; Gao Y; Lu X; Chen H; Tang Q; Hua C; Zhou M; Zou X; Yin Q
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():138-146. PubMed ID: 31439233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging.
Chen T; Li Y; Lu SS; Zhang YD; Wang XN; Luo CY; Shi HB
Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):995.e11-995.e20. PubMed ID: 28774471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion kurtosis MRI versus conventional diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluating inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease.
Huang L; Li XH; Huang SY; Zhang ZW; Yang XF; Lin JJ; Jiang MJ; Feng ST; Sun CH; Li ZP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Mar; 47(3):702-709. PubMed ID: 28577319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of diagnostic performance between diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters and mono-exponential ADC for determination of clinically significant cancer in patients with prostate cancer.
Park H; Kim SH; Lee Y; Son JH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4235-4243. PubMed ID: 32965517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined With DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.
Wang X; Tu N; Qin T; Xing F; Wang P; Wu G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 30085835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of the amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in the study of cervical cancer.
Meng N; Wang X; Sun J; Han D; Ma X; Wang K; Wang M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5758-5767. PubMed ID: 32424593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology.
Shan Y; Chen X; Liu K; Zeng M; Zhou J
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Oct; 44(10):3441-3452. PubMed ID: 31144091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between T2 relaxation and apparent diffusion coefficient in malignant and non-malignant prostate regions and the effect of peripheral zone fractional volume.
Simpkin CJ; Morgan VA; Giles SL; Riches SF; Parker C; deSouza NM
Br J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 86(1024):20120469. PubMed ID: 23426849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New RESOLVE-Based Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging in MRI-Visible Prostate Cancer: Effect of Reduced b Value on Image Quality and Diagnostic Effectiveness.
Zhang YD; Wu CJ; Bao ML; Li H; Yan X; Liu XS; Shi HB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Aug; 207(2):330-8. PubMed ID: 27187062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm2.
Feng Z; Min X; Margolis DJ; Duan C; Chen Y; Sah VK; Chaudhary N; Li B; Ke Z; Zhang P; Wang L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172127. PubMed ID: 28199367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Triexponential function analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosing prostate cancer.
Ueda Y; Takahashi S; Ohno N; Kyotani K; Kawamitu H; Miyati T; Aoyama N; Ueno Y; Kitajima K; Kawakami F; Okuaki T; Tsukamoto R; Yanagita E; Sugimura K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jan; 43(1):138-48. PubMed ID: 26119033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measured Multipoint Ultra-High b-Value Diffusion MRI in the Assessment of MRI-Detected Prostate Lesions.
Tavakoli AA; Kuder TA; Tichy D; Radtke JP; Görtz M; Schütz V; Stenzinger A; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
Invest Radiol; 2021 Feb; 56(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 32930560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer.
Gupta RT; Kauffman CR; Garcia-Reyes K; Palmeri ML; Madden JF; Polascik TJ; Rosenkrantz AB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):331-6. PubMed ID: 26204283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultra-High-
Mokry T; Mlynarska-Bujny A; Kuder TA; Hasse FC; Hog R; Wallwiener M; Dinkic C; Brucker J; Sinn P; Gnirs R; Kauczor HU; Schlemmer HP; Rom J; Bickelhaupt S
Radiology; 2020 Aug; 296(2):358-369. PubMed ID: 32544033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of a diffusion kurtosis model in the differential diagnosis of orofacial tumours.
Panyarak W; Chikui T; Tokumori K; Yamashita Y; Kamitani T; Togao O; Yoshiura K
Clin Radiol; 2020 Jul; 75(7):507-519. PubMed ID: 32067698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging and Standard Mono-Exponential Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Diagnosis of Significant Prostate Cancer-A Correlation with Gleason Score Assessed on Whole-Mount Histopathology Specimens.
Żurowska A; Pęksa R; Grzywińska M; Panas D; Sowa M; Skrobisz K; Matuszewski M; Szurowska E
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36672983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histogram analysis in prostate cancer: a comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging model versus monoexponential model.
Jiang Y; Li C; Liu Y; Shi K; Zhang W; Liu M; Chen M
Acta Radiol; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1431-1440. PubMed ID: 32008343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
