311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29223461)
1. Antenatal Consultations at Extreme Prematurity: A Systematic Review of Parent Communication Needs.
Kharrat A; Moore GP; Beckett S; Nicholls SG; Sampson M; Daboval T
J Pediatr; 2018 May; 196():109-115.e7. PubMed ID: 29223461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lost in explanation: Lessons learned from audio-recordings and surveys of the antenatal consultation.
Studer EM; Marc-Aurele KL
J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2016; 9(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 27834784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Qualitative Study of Parental Perspectives on Prenatal Counseling at Extreme Prematurity.
Sullivan A; Arzuaga B; Luff D; Young V; Schnur M; Williams D; Cummings C
J Pediatr; 2022 Dec; 251():17-23.e2. PubMed ID: 36096177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decision-Making for Extremely Preterm Infants: A Qualitative Systematic Review.
Krick JA; Feltman DM; Arnolds M
J Pediatr; 2022 Dec; 251():6-16. PubMed ID: 35940293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parents' early healthcare transition experiences with preterm and acutely ill infants: a scoping review.
Ballantyne M; Orava T; Bernardo S; McPherson AC; Church P; Fehlings D
Child Care Health Dev; 2017 Nov; 43(6):783-796. PubMed ID: 28370174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expectant parents' views of factors influencing infant feeding decisions in the antenatal period: A systematic review.
Roll CL; Cheater F
Int J Nurs Stud; 2016 Aug; 60():145-55. PubMed ID: 27297376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating parental perceptions of written handbooks provided during shared decision making with parents anticipating extremely preterm birth.
Mardian E; Bucking S; Dunn S; Lemyre B; Daboval T; Moore GP
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jul; 35(14):2723-2730. PubMed ID: 32727235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PARENTS 2 Study: a qualitative study of the views of healthcare professionals and stakeholders on parental engagement in the perinatal mortality review-from 'bottom of the pile' to joint learning.
Bakhbakhi D; Burden C; Storey C; Heazell AE; Lynch M; Timlin L; Gold K; Siassakos D
BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 8(11):e023792. PubMed ID: 30798293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of patients and their healthcare professionals around oral dosage form modification: A systematic review of the qualitative literature.
Mc Gillicuddy A; Kelly M; Crean AM; Sahm LJ
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2017; 13(4):717-726. PubMed ID: 27729203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. End-of-Life Decision Making for Parents of Extremely Preterm Infants.
Hendriks MJ; Abraham A
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2017; 46(5):727-736. PubMed ID: 28751157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antenatal consultation and deliberation: adapting to parental preferences.
Haward MF; Lorenz JM; Janvier A; Fischhoff B
J Perinatol; 2023 Jul; 43(7):895-902. PubMed ID: 36725985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metasynthesis of Factors That Influence Parents' Participation in Pain Management for Their Infants in the NICU.
McNair C; Chinian N; Shah V; McAllister M; Franck LS; Stevens B; Burry L; Taddio A
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2020 May; 49(3):263-271. PubMed ID: 32277879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shared Decision Making at the Limit of Viability: A Blueprint for Physician Action.
Daboval T; Shidler S; Thomas D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166151. PubMed ID: 27893823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transition from hospital to home: Parents' perception of their preparation and readiness for discharge with their preterm infant.
Aydon L; Hauck Y; Murdoch J; Siu D; Sharp M
J Clin Nurs; 2018 Jan; 27(1-2):269-277. PubMed ID: 28514524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. More than information: a qualitative study of parents' perspectives on neonatal intensive care at the extremes of prematurity.
Pepper D; Rempel G; Austin W; Ceci C; Hendson L
Adv Neonatal Care; 2012 Oct; 12(5):303-9. PubMed ID: 22964607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing shared decision making during antenatal consultations regarding extreme prematurity.
Ding S; Bijelić V; Daboval T; Dunn S; Lemyre B; Barrowman N; Moore GP
J Perinatol; 2023 Jan; 43(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 36284208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.
Rittenmeyer L; Huffman D; Alagna M; Moore E
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Feb; 14(2):174-255. PubMed ID: 27536798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
MacKinnon K; Marcellus L; Rivers J; Gordon C; Ryan M; Butcher D
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26447004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Personalized Decision Making: Practical Recommendations for Antenatal Counseling for Fragile Neonates.
Haward MF; Gaucher N; Payot A; Robson K; Janvier A
Clin Perinatol; 2017 Jun; 44(2):429-445. PubMed ID: 28477670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Professionals' preferences in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability: a nationwide qualitative Dutch study.
Geurtzen R; van Heijst A; Draaisma J; Ouwerkerk L; Scheepers H; Woiski M; Hermens R; Hogeveen M
Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Aug; 176(8):1107-1119. PubMed ID: 28687856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
