142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29223480)
1. Enlisting the willing: A study of healthcare professional-initiated and opt-in biobanking consent reveals improvement opportunities throughout the registration process.
Fradgley EA; Chong SE; Cox ME; Paul CL; Gedye C
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Jan; 89():36-41. PubMed ID: 29223480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patients' experiences and preferences for opt-in models and health professional involvement in biobanking consent: A cross-sectional survey of Australian cancer outpatients.
Fradgley EA; Chong SE; Cox ME; Gedye C; Paul CL
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 29573159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "As Long as You Ask": A Qualitative Study of Biobanking Consent-Oncology Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Attitudes, Motivations, and Experiences-the B-PPAE Study.
Yip S; Fleming J; Shepherd HL; Walczak A; Clark J; Butow P
Oncologist; 2019 Jun; 24(6):844-856. PubMed ID: 30413662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public support and consent preference for biomedical research and biobanking in Jordan.
Ahram M; Othman A; Shahrouri M
Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 May; 21(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 22968133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biobanking in Israel 2016-17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment.
Koren G; Beller D; Laifenfeld D; Grossman I; Shalev V
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 29149849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling Clinical Processes to Consent Research Donors of Remnant Biospecimens in an Outpatient Cardiology Clinic.
Soares SE; Anderson NR; Solis LJ; López JE
Biopreserv Biobank; 2020 Apr; 18(2):53-63. PubMed ID: 31880471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Participants' Understanding of Informed Consent for Biobanking: A Systematic Review.
Eisenhauer ER; Tait AR; Rieh SY; Arslanian-Engoren CM
Clin Nurs Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 28745067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. For what am I participating? The need for communication after receiving consent from biobanking project participants: experience in Japan.
Watanabe M; Inoue Y; Chang C; Hong H; Kobayashi I; Suzuki S; Muto K
J Hum Genet; 2011 May; 56(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 21390038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Opinions of Young Adults on Re-Consenting for Biobanking.
Rush A; Battisti R; Barton B; Catchpoole D
J Pediatr; 2015 Oct; 167(4):925-30. PubMed ID: 26235663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing model biobanking consent language: what matters to prospective participants?
Beskow LM; Hammack-Aviran CM; Brelsford KM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):119. PubMed ID: 32414333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent for biobanking research: cancer patient recruitment from rural communities in Maine.
Morrison DG; Farah C; Hock JM
Biopreserv Biobank; 2013 Apr; 11(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 24845431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consent for biobanking: assessing the understanding and views of cancer patients.
Mancini J; Pellegrini I; Viret F; Vey N; Daufresne LM; Chabannon C; Julian-Reynier C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Jan; 103(2):154-7. PubMed ID: 21173381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking.
Bryant J; Sanson-Fisher R; Fradgley E; Regan T; Hobden B; Ackland SP
BMC Cancer; 2015 May; 15():413. PubMed ID: 25981796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No regrets: Young adult patients in psychiatry report positive reactions to biobank participation.
Cunningham JL; Zanzi M; Willebrand M; Ekselius L; Ramklint M
BMC Psychiatry; 2017 Jan; 17(1):21. PubMed ID: 28095825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors that may influence the willingness of cancer patients to consent for biobanking.
Pillai U; Phillips K; Wilkins G; Baxter RC; Benn DE; Parker NR; Smith RC; Marsh DJ
Biopreserv Biobank; 2014 Dec; 12(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 25496153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Research participant understanding and engagement in an institutional, self-consent biobank model.
Schmanski A; Roberts E; Coors M; Wicks SJ; Arbet J; Weber R; Crooks K; Barnes KC; Taylor MRG
J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):257-267. PubMed ID: 32951257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the stability of biobank donor preferences regarding sample use: evidence supporting the value of dynamic consent.
Pacyna JE; McCormick JB; Olson JE; Winkler EM; Bublitz JT; Hathcock MA; Sharp RR
Eur J Hum Genet; 2020 Sep; 28(9):1168-1177. PubMed ID: 32327712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incorporating Biobank Consent into a Healthcare Setting: Challenges for Patient Understanding.
Kasperbauer TJ; Schmidt KK; Thomas A; Perkins SM; Schwartz PH
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(2):113-122. PubMed ID: 33275086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health professionals' opinions on supporting a cancer biobank: identification of barriers to combat biobanking pitfalls.
Caixeiro NJ; Byun HL; Descallar J; Levesque JV; de Souza P; Soon Lee C
Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 May; 24(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 26328505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sample and data sharing barriers in biobanking: consent, committees, and compromises.
Colledge F; Persson K; Elger B; Shaw D
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2014 Apr; 18(2):78-81. PubMed ID: 24485935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
