These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29223495)

  • 1. Estimation of spinal joint centers from external back profile and anatomical landmarks.
    Nerot A; Skalli W; Wang X
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():96-101. PubMed ID: 29223495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A principal component analysis of the relationship between the external body shape and internal skeleton for the upper body.
    Nerot A; Skalli W; Wang X
    J Biomech; 2016 Oct; 49(14):3415-3422. PubMed ID: 27692529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pelvis and femur shape prediction using principal component analysis for body model on seat comfort assessment. Impact on the prediction of the used palpable anatomical landmarks as predictors.
    Savonnet L; Duprey S; Van Sint Jan S; Wang X
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221201. PubMed ID: 31454359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multisegment Kinematics of the Spinal Column: Soft Tissue Artifacts Assessment.
    Mahallati S; Rouhani H; Preuss R; Masani K; Popovic MR
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Jul; 138(7):. PubMed ID: 27151927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Normative 3D opto-electronic stereo-photogrammetric sagittal alignment parameters in a young healthy adult population.
    Kinel E; D'Amico M; Roncoletta P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203679. PubMed ID: 30192866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normative 3D opto-electronic stereo-photogrammetric posture and spine morphology data in young healthy adult population.
    D'Amico M; Kinel E; Roncoletta P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179619. PubMed ID: 28640899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting spinal profile using 3D non-contact surface scanning: Changes in surface topography as a predictor of internal spinal alignment.
    Little JP; Rayward L; Pearcy MJ; Izatt MT; Green D; Labrom RD; Askin GN
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222453. PubMed ID: 31557174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomic Evaluation of the Sacroiliac Joint: A Radiographic Study with Implications for Procedures.
    Rana SH; Farjoodi P; Haloman S; Dutton P; Hariri A; Ward SR; Garfin SR; Chang DG
    Pain Physician; 2015 Nov; 18(6):583-92. PubMed ID: 26606010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system.
    Schlatterer B; Suedhoff I; Bonnet X; Catonne Y; Maestro M; Skalli W
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Feb; 95(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 19251231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of sagittal spine-pelvis-leg alignment in patients with severe hip osteoarthritis.
    Weng WJ; Wang WJ; Wu MD; Xu ZH; Xu LL; Qiu Y
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Jun; 24(6):1228-36. PubMed ID: 25421550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting the lumbosacral joint centre location from palpable anatomical landmarks.
    Murphy AJ; Bull AM; McGregor AH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Nov; 225(11):1078-83. PubMed ID: 22292206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joint center longitudinal positions computed from a selected subset of Chandler's data.
    de Leva P
    J Biomech; 1996 Sep; 29(9):1231-3. PubMed ID: 8872283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3D quantitative evaluation of spine proprioceptive perception/motor control through instinctive self-correction maneuver in healthy young subjects' posture: an observational study.
    D'amico M; Kinel E; Roncoletta P
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2018 Jun; 54(3):428-439. PubMed ID: 28718273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical note: repeatability of measurement in determining stature in sitting and standing postures.
    Rodacki CL; Fowler NE; Rodacki AL; Birch K
    Ergonomics; 2001 Oct; 44(12):1076-85. PubMed ID: 11780730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine.
    Knott PT; Mardjetko SM; Techy F
    Spine J; 2010 Nov; 10(11):994-8. PubMed ID: 20970739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EOS microdose protocol for the radiological follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Ilharreborde B; Ferrero E; Alison M; Mazda K
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Feb; 25(2):526-31. PubMed ID: 25906380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vertebral axial rotation measurement method.
    Chi WM; Cheng CW; Yeh WC; Chuang SC; Chang TS; Chen JH
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 16303206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coronal plane trunk asymmetry is associated with whole-body sagittal alignment in healthy young adolescents before pubertal peak growth.
    Dolphens M; Vleeming A; Castelein R; Vanderstraeten G; Schlösser T; Plasschaert F; Danneels L
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Feb; 27(2):448-457. PubMed ID: 28578458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the scoliotic spine and pelvis from uncalibrated biplanar x-ray images.
    Kadoury S; Cheriet F; Dansereau J; Labelle H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Apr; 20(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 17414987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.