359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29223711)
21. TongueSim: Development of an Automated Method for Rapid Assessment of Fungiform Papillae Density for Taste Research.
Sanyal S; O'Brien SM; Hayes JE; Feeney EL
Chem Senses; 2016 May; 41(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 26892308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detection thresholds for quinine, PTC, and PROP measured using taste strips.
Cavazzana A; Knaapila A; Roßkopf F; Han P; Hummel T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 276(3):753-759. PubMed ID: 30604062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. PROP taster status and self-perceived food adventurousness influence food preferences.
Ullrich NV; Touger-Decker R; O'sullivan-Maillet J; Tepper BJ
J Am Diet Assoc; 2004 Apr; 104(4):543-9. PubMed ID: 15054337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The gustin (CA6) gene polymorphism, rs2274333 (A/G), as a mechanistic link between PROP tasting and fungiform taste papilla density and maintenance.
Melis M; Atzori E; Cabras S; Zonza A; Calò C; Muroni P; Nieddu M; Padiglia A; Sogos V; Tepper BJ; Tomassini Barbarossa I
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74151. PubMed ID: 24040192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Supertaster, super reactive: oral sensitivity for bitter taste modulates emotional approach and avoidance behavior in the affective startle paradigm.
Herbert C; Platte P; Wiemer J; Macht M; Blumenthal TD
Physiol Behav; 2014 Aug; 135():198-207. PubMed ID: 24912136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Number of Fungiform Papillae, Taste Sensitivity and Smell Functions of Children Aged 11-15.
Sobek G; Jagielski P
Nutrients; 2022 Jun; 14(13):. PubMed ID: 35807758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Relation between PROP taster status and fat perception, touch, and olfaction.
Yackinous C; Guinard JX
Physiol Behav; 2001 Feb; 72(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 11274688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An automated system for the objective evaluation of human gustatory sensitivity using tongue biopotential recordings.
Pani D; Usai I; Cosseddu P; Melis M; Sollai G; Crnjar R; Tomassini Barbarossa I; Raffo L; Bonfiglio A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0177246. PubMed ID: 28767651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic responses to bitter and sweet tastes.
Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Shore AB
Chem Senses; 1997 Feb; 22(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9056083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Associations between Sweet Taste Sensitivity and Polymorphisms (SNPs) in the
Melis M; Mastinu M; Naciri LC; Muroni P; Tomassini Barbarossa I
Nutrients; 2022 Nov; 14(22):. PubMed ID: 36432589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Oral sensory phenotype identifies level of sugar and fat required for maximal liking.
Hayes JE; Duffy VB
Physiol Behav; 2008 Sep; 95(1-2):77-87. PubMed ID: 18538361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Acquired hedonic and sensory characteristics of odours: influence of sweet liker and propylthiouracil taster status.
Yeomans MR; Prescott J; Gould NJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1648-64. PubMed ID: 19180363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Regional differences in suprathreshold intensity for bitter and umami stimuli.
Feeney EL; Hayes JE
Chemosens Percept; 2014 Dec; 7(3-4):147-157. PubMed ID: 25485034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Electrogustometric thresholds: relationship to anterior tongue locus, area of stimulation, and number of fungiform papillae.
Miller SL; Mirza N; Doty RL
Physiol Behav; 2002 Apr; 75(5):753-7. PubMed ID: 12020740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste.
Duffy VB; Bartoshuk LM
J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Jun; 100(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 10863567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Association of tongue brushing with the number of fungiform taste buds and taste perception: A preliminary study using confocal laser scanning microscopy in combination with a filter-paper disc method.
Kobayashi J; Saito T; Ito T; Yoshimura H; Matsuda S; Yoshida H; Fujita R; Sano K
Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Dec; 84():145-150. PubMed ID: 28992600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Relationship of papillae number to bitter intensity of quinine and PROP within and between individuals.
Delwiche JF; Buletic Z; Breslin PA
Physiol Behav; 2001 Oct; 74(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 11714496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The gustin (CA6) gene polymorphism, rs2274333 (A/G), is associated with fungiform papilla density, whereas PROP bitterness is mostly due to TAS2R38 in an ethnically-mixed population.
Barbarossa IT; Melis M; Mattes MZ; Calò C; Muroni P; Crnjar R; Tepper BJ
Physiol Behav; 2015 Jan; 138():6-12. PubMed ID: 25447475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil is associated with gustin (carbonic anhydrase VI) gene polymorphism, salivary zinc, and body mass index in humans.
Padiglia A; Zonza A; Atzori E; Chillotti C; Calò C; Tepper BJ; Barbarossa IT
Am J Clin Nutr; 2010 Sep; 92(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 20631203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) supertasters and the saltiness of NaCl.
Bartoshuk LM; Duffy VB; Lucchina LA; Prutkin J; Fast K
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Nov; 855():793-6. PubMed ID: 9929686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
