BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29223713)

  • 1. Diagnostic Values of DCE-MRI and DSC-MRI for Differentiation Between High-grade and Low-grade Gliomas: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.
    Liang J; Liu D; Gao P; Zhang D; Chen H; Shi C; Luo L
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):338-348. PubMed ID: 29223713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis.
    Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative percentage signal intensity recovery of perfusion metrics—an efficient tool for differentiating grades of glioma.
    Smitha KA; Gupta AK; Jayasree RS
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Aug; 88(1052):20140784. PubMed ID: 26110202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DSC and DCE Histogram Analyses of Glioma Biomarkers, Including IDH, MGMT, and TERT, on Differentiation and Survival.
    Zhang HW; Lyu GW; He WJ; Lei Y; Lin F; Wang MZ; Zhang H; Liang LH; Feng YN; Yang JH
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Dec; 27(12):e263-e271. PubMed ID: 31983532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Glioma grading capability: comparisons among parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and ADC value on DWI.
    Choi HS; Kim AH; Ahn SS; Shin NY; Kim J; Lee SK
    Korean J Radiol; 2013; 14(3):487-92. PubMed ID: 23690718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The diagnostic value of quantitative analysis of ASL, DSC-MRI and DKI in the grading of cerebral gliomas: a meta-analysis.
    Luan J; Wu M; Wang X; Qiao L; Guo G; Zhang C
    Radiat Oncol; 2020 Aug; 15(1):204. PubMed ID: 32831106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of 3-dimensional pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling with dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in grading of human glioma.
    Roy B; Awasthi R; Bindal A; Sahoo P; Kumar R; Behari S; Ojha BK; Husain N; Pandey CM; Rathore RK; Gupta RK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 23673999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain Gliomas: Multicenter Standardized Assessment of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MR Images.
    Anzalone N; Castellano A; Cadioli M; Conte GM; Cuccarini V; Bizzi A; Grimaldi M; Costa A; Grillea G; Vitali P; Aquino D; Terreni MR; Torri V; Erickson BJ; Caulo M
    Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):933-943. PubMed ID: 29361245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differentiation between glioblastoma and primary CNS lymphoma: application of DCE-MRI parameters based on arterial input function obtained from DSC-MRI.
    Kang KM; Choi SH; Chul-Kee P; Kim TM; Park SH; Lee JH; Lee ST; Hwang I; Yoo RE; Yun TJ; Kim JH; Sohn CH
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9098-9109. PubMed ID: 34003350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.
    Jia L; Wu X; Wan Q; Wan L; Jia W; Zhang N
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20200699. PubMed ID: 33332981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion parameters for high-grade glioma patients.
    Ulyte A; Katsaros VK; Liouta E; Stranjalis G; Boskos C; Papanikolaou N; Usinskiene J; Bisdas S
    Neuroradiology; 2016 Dec; 58(12):1197-1208. PubMed ID: 27796446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tumor recurrence versus treatment effects in glioma: A comparative study of three dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging.
    Xu Q; Liu Q; Ge H; Ge X; Wu J; Qu J; Xu K
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e9332. PubMed ID: 29390403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Diagnostic Value of Combining Permeability with T1 Perfusion Parameters in Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Glioma Grading].
    Sun SJ; Qian HF; Li FQ; Li ZY; Wu X
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2015 Dec; 37(6):674-80. PubMed ID: 26725390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI evaluate VEGF expression in brain glioma? An MRI-guided stereotactic biopsy study.
    Di N; Cheng W; Jiang X; Liu X; Zhou J; Xie Q; Chu Z; Chen H; Wang B
    J Neuroradiol; 2019 May; 46(3):186-192. PubMed ID: 29752976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.
    Abrigo JM; Fountain DM; Provenzale JM; Law EK; Kwong JS; Hart MG; Tam WWS
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jan; 1(1):CD011551. PubMed ID: 29357120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differentiating between Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-grade Glioma Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging with Histogram Analysis.
    Murayama K; Nishiyama Y; Hirose Y; Abe M; Ohyu S; Ninomiya A; Fukuba T; Katada K; Toyama H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jan; 17(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 28515410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative analysis of permeability for glioma grading using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
    Zhao M; Guo LL; Huang N; Wu Q; Zhou L; Zhao H; Zhang J; Fu K
    Oncol Lett; 2017 Nov; 14(5):5418-5426. PubMed ID: 29113174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative Assessment of Tumor Cell Proliferation in Brain Gliomas with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
    Jiang JS; Hua Y; Zhou XJ; Shen DD; Shi JL; Ge M; Geng QN; Jia ZZ
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Sep; 26(9):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 30416002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amide proton transfer imaging to discriminate between low- and high-grade gliomas: added value to apparent diffusion coefficient and relative cerebral blood volume.
    Choi YS; Ahn SS; Lee SK; Chang JH; Kang SG; Kim SH; Zhou J
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Aug; 27(8):3181-3189. PubMed ID: 28116517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrimination between glioma grades II and III in suspected low-grade gliomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging: a histogram analysis approach.
    Falk A; Fahlström M; Rostrup E; Berntsson S; Zetterling M; Morell A; Larsson HB; Smits A; Larsson EM
    Neuroradiology; 2014 Dec; 56(12):1031-8. PubMed ID: 25204450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.