These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29223946)
1. [Quality of the exo-endocervical sampling in the prevention of uterine cervix cancer]. Angeleri AA; Díaz LB; Coliva G; Guerra F; Palaoro LA; Rocher AE Medicina (B Aires); 2017; 77(6):512-514. PubMed ID: 29223946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial. McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Order of endocervical and ectocervical cytologic sampling and the quality of the Papanicolaou smear. Eisenberger D; Hernandez E; Tener T; Atkinson BF Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):755-8. PubMed ID: 9351759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling. Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Obstacles to the early detection of endocervical adenocarcinoma. Kalir T; Simsir A; Demopoulos HB; Demopoulos RI Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2005 Oct; 24(4):399-403. PubMed ID: 16175089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix. Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sampling accuracy of the modified Ayre spatula/Zelsmyr Cytobrush versus the modified Ayre spatula/bulb aspirator in the collection of cells from the uterine cervix. Selvaggi SM; Malviya V Diagn Cytopathol; 1991; 7(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 1879271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison between the Accu-Pap device and the extended-tip wooden Ayre spatula for cervical cytology sampling. Stock RJ; Thurmond AI; Passmore A Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 3376697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Sampling devices for the Papanicolaou test]. Broso P; Buffetti G; Sacco A Minerva Ginecol; 1992 Sep; 44(9):441-7. PubMed ID: 1436619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear? Sigurdsson K Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of the sampling sequence on the quality of Papanicolaou smear. Rahnama P; Faghihzadeh S; Ziaei S Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 15670299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adjunctive high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing is a useful option for disease risk assessment in patients with negative Papanicolaou tests without an endocervical/transformation zone sample. Zhao C; Austin RM Cancer; 2008 Aug; 114(4):242-8. PubMed ID: 18484643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Merits and pitfalls of normal saline rehydrated air-dried cervical smears over conventional wet.fixed PAP smears: A comparative study. Kamble SA; Dombale VD; Shah F Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2022; 65(1):100-104. PubMed ID: 35074972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of Cervical Pap Smear with Biopsy in the Lesion of Cervix. Dhakal R; Makaju R; Sharma S; Bhandari S; Shrestha S; Bastakoti R Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2016 Jul-Sept.; 14(55):254-257. PubMed ID: 28814689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study. Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates. Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Factors Associated with Specimen Adequacy for Conventional Cervical Cytology in Thammasat University Hospital, Thailand. Anantaworapot A; Manusook S; Tanprasertkul C; Lertvutivivat S; Chanthasenanont A; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4209-4212. PubMed ID: 27797219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method]. Ivanov S Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear. Marchand L; Mundt M; Klein G; Agarwal SC WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):51-5. PubMed ID: 16218317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]