These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29224549)

  • 1. Why we need a golden rule for peer review.
    Tuckett AG; Kangasniemi M
    Nurs Ethics; 2017 Dec; 24(8):875-877. PubMed ID: 29224549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reviewing scientific manuscripts.
    Castagnetti M; Bagli D; Fossum M;
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Apr; 14(2):133-134. PubMed ID: 29429827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review: A critical cog in the scholarship wheel.
    Zavod RM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018; 10(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29248064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review: universal, but valid?
    Sataloff RT
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2009 Apr; 88(4):848-51. PubMed ID: 19358120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ethics of peer review: What to know before saying "yes".
    Siedlecki SL
    Nurs Manage; 2016 Jul; 47(7):44-8. PubMed ID: 27351121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On peer review.
    Nativio DG
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 1991; 3(1):1. PubMed ID: 2007055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
    Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pride and prejudice in peer review.
    Kemper KJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44(4-5):343-5. PubMed ID: 2010777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Civil Discourse and Peer Review.
    Brucker MC
    Nurs Womens Health; 2017 Dec; 21(6):421-422. PubMed ID: 29223204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer Review.
    Wierzbinski-Cross H
    J Nurses Prof Dev; 2017; 33(2):102-104. PubMed ID: 28252494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Construction, consent, and condemnation in research on peer review.
    Feinstein AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44(4-5):339-41. PubMed ID: 2010776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Post Publication Peer Review: Is it Coming to Your Nursing Journal?
    Pierson CA
    J Am Assoc Nurse Pract; 2016 Jun; 28(6):286. PubMed ID: 27273106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review: purpose, process and publication.
    Thistlethwaite J
    Clin Teach; 2012 Aug; 9(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 22783849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition for Reviewers: PUBLONS!
    Cuellar NG
    J Transcult Nurs; 2018 May; 29(3):221. PubMed ID: 29537346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Value and Process of Peer Review.
    Dunn D
    AORN J; 2018 Jun; 107(6):661-664. PubMed ID: 29851050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peering into the review process.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review in scientific journals--what good is it?
    Relman AS
    West J Med; 1990 Nov; 153(5):520-2. PubMed ID: 2260288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review: A critical step in the editorial process.
    Agrawal R
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020; 63(3):347-349. PubMed ID: 32769320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.