521 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29224769)
1. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech Recognition in Noise in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology.
Wesarg T; Arndt S; Wiebe K; Schmid F; Huber A; Mülder HE; Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Speck I
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):607-618. PubMed ID: 30430986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Verification Protocol for Signal Transparency Using the Cochlear Mini-Microphone 2+ and Digital Modulation Transmitter and Receiver with Cochlear Implants.
Sousa R; Nair E; Wannagot S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 30461401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Adaptive, Digital Remote Microphone Technology and a Speech Enhancement Sound Processing Algorithm.
Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):502-508. PubMed ID: 26055839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conversion of adult Nucleus® 5 cochlear implant users to the Nucleus® 6 system.
De Ceulaer G; Swinnen F; Pascoal D; Philips B; Killian M; James C; Govaerts PJ; Dhooge I
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jul; 16(4):222-32. PubMed ID: 25284643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving Hearing Performance for Cochlear Implant Recipients with Use of a Digital, Wireless, Remote-Microphone, Audio-Streaming Accessory.
Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 26134720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech understanding in noise with the Roger Pen, Naida CI Q70 processor, and integrated Roger 17 receiver in a multi-talker network.
De Ceulaer G; Bestel J; Mülder HE; Goldbeck F; de Varebeke SP; Govaerts PJ
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 273(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 25983309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Wesarg T; Stelzig Y; Hilgert-Becker D; Kathage B; Wiebe K; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Speck I
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):246-256. PubMed ID: 31580804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of cochlear's SCAN and wireless microphones to improve speech understanding in noise with the Nucleus6® CP900 processor.
De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Vanpoucke F; Govaerts PJ
Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):837-843. PubMed ID: 28695749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using Microphone Technology to Improve Speech Perception in Noise in Children with Cochlear Implants.
Johnstone PM; Mills KET; Humphrey E; Yeager KR; Jones E; McElligott K; Pierce A; Agrawal S; Froeling C; Little JP
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Oct; 29(9):814-825. PubMed ID: 30278866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The efficacy of microphone directionality in improving speech recognition in noise for three commercial cochlear-implant systems.
Sivonen V; Willberg T; Aarnisalo AA; Dietz A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 May; 21(3):153-159. PubMed ID: 32160829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech polar plots for different directionality settings of SONNET cochlear implant processor.
De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Nopp P; Péan V; J Govaerts P
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):299-311. PubMed ID: 31453760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of wireless remote microphone application on speech discrimination in noise in children with cochlear implants.
Mehrkian S; Bayat Z; Javanbakht M; Emamdjomeh H; Bakhshi E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 125():192-195. PubMed ID: 31369931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.
Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation.
van der Beek FB; Soede W; Frijns JH
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 17204902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Verification of a Proposed Clinical Electroacoustic Test Protocol for Personal Digital Modulation Receivers Coupled to Cochlear Implant Sound Processors.
Nair EL; Sousa R; Wannagot S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(7):625-635. PubMed ID: 28722645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
