156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29225641)
1. Foramen Changes following Over Instrumentation of Curved Canals with Three Engine-Driven Instruments: An
Yammine S; Jabbour E; Nahas P; Majzoub Z
Iran Endod J; 2017; 12(4):454-461. PubMed ID: 29225641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Canal Straightening Following Overinstrumentation with Three Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments.
Yammine S; Jabbour E; Diemer F; Majzoub Z
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2018; 8(3):245-251. PubMed ID: 29911063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Apically Extruded Debris following Programmed Over Instrumentation of Curved Canals with Three Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments.
Yammine SD; Jabbour EA
Eur J Dent; 2021 Feb; 15(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 32864731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The effect of instrumentation on original apical foramen shape using steel vs niti rotatory: computerized analysis].
Gallina G; Cumbo E; Gallo P; Pizzo G; D'Angelo M
Minerva Stomatol; 2002; 51(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 11845115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shaping Ability of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper NEXT and WaveOne Primary in Severely Curved Resin Blocks.
Tavanafar S; Gilani PV; Saleh AM; Schäfer E
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 20(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 31204330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shaping ability of four single-file systems in the instrumentation of second mesiobuccal canals of three-dimensional printed maxillary first molars.
Xu F; Zhang Y; Gu Y; Ping Y; Zhou R; Wang J
Ann Transl Med; 2021 Sep; 9(18):1425. PubMed ID: 34733977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shaping potential of manual NiTi K-File and rotary ProTaper and analyzing the final outcome of shaped canals using CT.
Kakar S; Dhingra A; Sharma H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):451-5. PubMed ID: 24171988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals.
Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 24697590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Root Canal Shaping Using Nickel Titanium, M-Wire, and Gold Wire: A Micro-computed Tomographic Comparative Study of One Shape, ProTaper Next, and WaveOne Gold Instruments in Maxillary First Molars.
van der Vyver PJ; Paleker F; Vorster M; de Wet FA
J Endod; 2019 Jan; 45(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 30446405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Micro-computed Tomographic Evaluation of Dentinal Microcracks after Preparation of Curved Root Canals with ProTaper Gold, WaveOne Gold, and ProTaper Next Instruments.
Miguéns-Vila R; Martín-Biedma B; De-Deus G; Belladonna FG; Peña-López A; Castelo-Baz P
J Endod; 2021 Feb; 47(2):309-314. PubMed ID: 33096193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A micro-computed tomography-based comparison of the canal transportation and centering ability of ProTaper Universal rotary and WaveOne reciprocating files.
McRay B; Cox TC; Cohenca N; Johnson JD; Paranjpe A
Quintessence Int; 2014 Feb; 45(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24389561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shaping ability of ProTaper NEXT and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals.
Bürklein S; Mathey D; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Aug; 48(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 25156248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of root canal shaping using protaper universal and protaper next rotary files in preclinical dental education.
Çelik G; Özdemir Kısacık F; Yılmaz EF; Mersinlioğlu A; Ertuğrul İF; Orhan H
PeerJ; 2019; 7():e7419. PubMed ID: 31489262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold and ProTaper Next in Simulated Curved Canals.
Florentino Silva P; Coelho E; Chagas Carvalho Alves N; Andrade Silva S; Cavalcanti Pereira F; Santana Albuquerque D
Iran Endod J; 2018; 13(4):498-502. PubMed ID: 36883021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shaping ability of nickel-titanium rotary instruments in curved root canals.
Talati A; Moradi S; Forghani M; Monajemzadeh A
Iran Endod J; 2013; 8(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 23717330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of single-file system versus multi-file system in severely curved root canals.
Yuan G; Yang G
J Dent Sci; 2018 Mar; 13(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 30895092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Experimental study of preparing curved root canals with different instrument].
Yin LY; Xie XL; Chen MM; Liu LH; Ling TY
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 26(6):660-3. PubMed ID: 19186866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
