These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29226437)
1. On Effective Graphic Communication of Health Inequality: Considerations for Health Policy Researchers. Asada Y; Abel H; Skedgel C; Warner G Milbank Q; 2017 Dec; 95(4):801-835. PubMed ID: 29226437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visualization formats of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a systematic review about preferences and interpretation accuracy. Albers EAC; Fraterman I; Walraven I; Wilthagen E; Schagen SB; van der Ploeg IM; Wouters MWJM; van de Poll-Franse LV; de Ligt KM J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2022 Mar; 6(1):18. PubMed ID: 35239055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study. McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Understanding and preferences regarding risk communication during pregnancy: a survey to facilitate provider communication with patients. Ferguson M; Shapiro GD; McDonald SD Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100929. PubMed ID: 36931434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Best Graph Type to Compare Discrete Groups: Bar, Dot, and Tally. Zhao F; Gaschler R Front Psychol; 2021; 12():775721. PubMed ID: 35002865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tables or bar graphs? Presenting test results in electronic medical records. Brewer NT; Gilkey MB; Lillie SE; Hesse BW; Sheridan SL Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):545-53. PubMed ID: 22472914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A course in constructing effective displays of data for pharmaceutical research personnel. Bradstreet TE; Nessly ML; Short TH Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 23564752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice. Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preference for and understanding of graphs presenting health risk information. The role of age, health literacy, numeracy and graph literacy. van Weert JCM; Alblas MC; van Dijk L; Jansen J Patient Educ Couns; 2021 Jan; 104(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 32727670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Communicating projected survival with treatments for chronic kidney disease: patient comprehension and perspectives on visual aids. Dowen F; Sidhu K; Broadbent E; Pilmore H BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Sep; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 28934951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Picture This: Presenting Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcome Research Study Results to Patients. Tolbert E; Brundage M; Bantug E; Blackford AL; Smith K; Snyder C; Med Decis Making; 2018 Nov; 38(8):994-1005. PubMed ID: 30132393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of numeracy on verbatim knowledge of the longitudinal risk for prostate cancer recurrence following radiation therapy. Hamstra DA; Johnson SB; Daignault S; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Taylor JM; Larkin K; Wood A; Fagerlin A Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 25277673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics. Garcia-Retamero R; Cokely ET Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):582-627. PubMed ID: 28192674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of format and content of visual display of data on comprehension, choice and preference: a systematic review. Hildon Z; Allwood D; Black N Int J Qual Health Care; 2012 Feb; 24(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 22166856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health inequality and governance in Scotland since 2007. Fox DM Public Health; 2013 Jun; 127(6):503-13. PubMed ID: 23725680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The visual communication of risk. Lipkus IM; Hollands JG J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1999; (25):149-63. PubMed ID: 10854471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Replacing bar graphs of continuous data with more informative graphics: are we making progress? Riedel N; Schulz R; Kazezian V; Weissgerber T Clin Sci (Lond); 2022 Aug; 136(15):1139-1156. PubMed ID: 35822444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Science-graphic art partnerships to increase research impact. Khoury CK; Kisel Y; Kantar M; Barber E; Ricciardi V; Klirs C; Kucera L; Mehrabi Z; Johnson N; Klabin S; Valiño Á; Nowakowski K; Bartomeus I; Ramankutty N; Miller A; Schipanski M; Gore MA; Novy A Commun Biol; 2019; 2():295. PubMed ID: 31396575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]