These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29226785)

  • 41. Comparison of face-based and voice-based first impressions in a Chinese sample.
    Jiang Z; Li D; Li Z; Yang Y; Liu Y; Yue X; Wu Q; Yang H; Cui X; Xue P
    Br J Psychol; 2024 Feb; 115(1):20-39. PubMed ID: 37401616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Headscarf Effect Revisited: Further Evidence for a Culture-Based Internal Face Processing Advantage.
    Wang Y; Thomas J; Weissgerber SC; Kazemini S; Ul-Haq I; Quadflieg S
    Perception; 2015 Mar; 44(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 26562256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The conceptual structure of face impressions.
    Stolier RM; Hehman E; Keller MD; Walker M; Freeman JB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Sep; 115(37):9210-9215. PubMed ID: 30139918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Beyond categories: Perceiving sexual attraction from faces.
    Bjornsdottir RT; Cheso D; Rule NO
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Feb; 113(1):226-247. PubMed ID: 34296765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Skin coloration is a culturally-specific cue for attractiveness, healthiness, and youthfulness in observers of Chinese and western European descent.
    Lu Y; Yang J; Xiao K; Pointer M; Li C; Wuerger S
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0259276. PubMed ID: 34710190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Economic status cues from clothes affect perceived competence from faces.
    Oh D; Shafir E; Todorov A
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Mar; 4(3):287-293. PubMed ID: 31819209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of facial occlusion on facial impressions of trustworthiness and dominance.
    Oliveira M; Garcia-Marques T
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Aug; 50(6):1131-1146. PubMed ID: 35501456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Facial race and sex cues have a comparable influence on emotion recognition in Chinese and Australian participants.
    Craig BM; Zhang J; Lipp OV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2212-2223. PubMed ID: 28681183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues.
    Freeman JB; Johnson KL; Ambady N; Rule NO
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1318-31. PubMed ID: 20682754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Differences in holistic processing do not explain cultural differences in the recognition of facial expression.
    Yan X; Young AW; Andrews TJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2445-2459. PubMed ID: 27766927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Understanding one's character through the voice: Dimensions of personality perception from Chinese greeting word "Ni Hao".
    Wu Q; Liu Y; Li D; Leng H; Iqbal Z; Jiang Z
    J Soc Psychol; 2021 Nov; 161(6):653-663. PubMed ID: 33413047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Anchoring Effects in Facial Attractiveness.
    Goller J; Leder H; Cursiter H; Jenkins R
    Perception; 2018; 47(10-11):1043-1053. PubMed ID: 30260271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cross-cultural agreement in facial attractiveness preferences: the role of ethnicity and gender.
    Coetzee V; Greeff JM; Stephen ID; Perrett DI
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e99629. PubMed ID: 24988325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Modeling individual preferences reveals that face beauty is not universally perceived across cultures.
    Zhan J; Liu M; Garrod OGB; Daube C; Ince RAA; Jack RE; Schyns PG
    Curr Biol; 2021 May; 31(10):2243-2252.e6. PubMed ID: 33798430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Very first impressions.
    Bar M; Neta M; Linz H
    Emotion; 2006 May; 6(2):269-78. PubMed ID: 16768559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Facial first impressions form two clusters representing approach-avoidance.
    Jones AL; Kramer RSS
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 May; 126():101387. PubMed ID: 33964592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Disclosing political partisanship polarizes first impressions of faces.
    Cassidy BS; Hughes C; Krendl AC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0276400. PubMed ID: 36350842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Facial radiance influences facial attractiveness and affective impressions of faces.
    Ikeda H; Saheki Y; Sakano Y; Wada A; Ando H; Tagai K
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2021 Apr; 43(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 33217010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cross-cultural perception of female facial appearance: A multi-ethnic and multi-centre study.
    Voegeli R; Schoop R; Prestat-Marquis E; Rawlings AV; Shackelford TK; Fink B
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245998. PubMed ID: 33481957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Decoding the language of first impressions: Comparing models of first impressions of faces derived from free-text descriptions and trait ratings.
    Jones AL; Shiramizu V; Jones BC
    Br J Psychol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38886926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.