These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29226962)

  • 1. EEG frequency PCA in EEG-ERP dynamics.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Psychophysiology; 2018 May; 55(5):e13042. PubMed ID: 29226962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using principal components analysis to examine resting state EEG in relation to task performance.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13327. PubMed ID: 30613986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resting state intrinsic EEG impacts on go stimulus-response processes.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Jun; 54(6):894-903. PubMed ID: 28258583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prestimulus EEG amplitude determinants of ERP responses in a habituation paradigm.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 23732790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EEG-ERP dynamics in a visual Continuous Performance Test.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():249-260. PubMed ID: 31648022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prestimulus delta and theta contributions to equiprobable Go/NoGo processing in healthy ageing.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():40-52. PubMed ID: 29775640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrinsic EEG and task-related changes in EEG affect Go/NoGo task performance.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ; Coleman EP; Wilson EJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Mar; 125():17-28. PubMed ID: 29409782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prestimulus delta and theta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 23073074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EEG phase states at stimulus onset in a variable-ISI Go/NoGo task: Effects on ERP components.
    Barry RJ; Fogarty JS; De Blasio FM; Karamacoska D
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Apr; 134():89-102. PubMed ID: 29462656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
    Borchard JP; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus-to-matching-stimulus interval influences N1, P2, and P3b in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Steiner GZ; Barry RJ; Gonsalvez CJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25034341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERP Go/NoGo condition effects are better detected with separate PCAs.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS; Karamacoska D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Aug; 106():50-64. PubMed ID: 27289050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in a fixed interstimulus interval equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a definitive study.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; De Pascalis V; Karamacoska D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 25043955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A processing schema for children in the auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task: ERP components and behaviour.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jan; 123():74-79. PubMed ID: 29122654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
    Jia H; Li H; Yu D
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance and ERP components in the equiprobable go/no-go task: Inhibition in children.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Sep; 52(9):1228-37. PubMed ID: 25959726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: children vs. adults.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Borchard JP
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Oct; 125(10):1995-2006. PubMed ID: 24661623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overcoming limitations of the ERP method with Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE): a demonstration in go/no-go experiments.
    Ouyang G; Schacht A; Zhou C; Sommer W
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Mar; 50(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 23316862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.