These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2922832)
21. The Angelchik prosthesis: experience with the anti-reflux device. Goldberg JA; Bell G; Morrice JJ; Davidson PM J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1987 Aug; 32(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 3681791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Endoscopic augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: multicenter study of the Gatekeeper Reflux Repair System. Fockens P; Bruno MJ; Gabbrielli A; Odegaard S; Hatlebakk J; Allescher HD; Rösch T; Rhodes M; Bastid C; Rey J; Boyer J; Muehldorffer S; van den Hombergh U; Costamagna G Endoscopy; 2004 Aug; 36(8):682-9. PubMed ID: 15280972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A prospective randomized double-blind study of gastroesophageal reflux surgery in pediatric-sized developmentally disabled patients: Nissen fundoplication versus Angelchik prosthesis. Gourley GR; Pellett JR; Li BU; Adkins WN J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 1986 Jan; 5(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 2935608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative post-operative study of prostheses, with and without an anti-reflux valve system, in the palliative treatment of esophageal carcinoma. Nunes CC; Waechter FL; Sampaio JA; Pinto RD; Alvares-Da-Silva MR; Pereira-Lima L Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(29):2859-64. PubMed ID: 10576361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surgical reintervention after antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a prospective cohort study in 130 patients. Furnée EJ; Draaisma WA; Broeders IA; Smout AJ; Gooszen HG Arch Surg; 2008 Mar; 143(3):267-74; discussion 274. PubMed ID: 18347274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Endogastric migration of an Angelchik prosthesis. A case report and review of the literature]. Massaioli N; Bertero D; Buzio M; Mecozzi B; Albertino B; Mosca A Minerva Chir; 1990 Feb; 45(3-4):189-94. PubMed ID: 2192307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Angelchik antireflux device: a 5-year experience. Timoney AG; Kelly JM; Welfare MR Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 May; 72(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 2357036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis using a model for esophageal reflux in rhesus monkeys. Cohen DJ; Benjamin SB; Graeber GM; Castell DO; Patrick DH; Cordova C; Dachman A; Friedman A Ann Thorac Surg; 1986 Feb; 41(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 3947163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [The Angelchik prosthesis--intermediate term evaluation and results]. Siewert JR; Feussner H Z Gastroenterol; 1988 Aug; 26(8):421-9. PubMed ID: 3064455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Radiology of the Angelchik prosthesis for gastroesophageal reflux. Burhenne LJ; Fratkin LB; Flak B; Burhenne HJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):507-11. PubMed ID: 6607635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Laparoscopic treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux by fundoplication]. Hidraoui K; Chehab F; Khaiz D; Lakhloufi A; Bouzidi A Tunis Med; 2003 May; 81(5):299-302. PubMed ID: 12934449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Angelchik prosthesis and its complications. Blower AL; Clegg JF J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1986 Feb; 31(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 3712303 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Surgery for gastro-oesophageal reflux: the Angelchik prosthesis compared to the floppy Nissen fundoplication. Two-year follow-up study and a five-year evaluation of the Angelchik prosthesis. Dehn TC Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1990 Jan; 72(1):69. PubMed ID: 2301909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Role of intra-oesophageal impedance monitoring in the evaluation of endoscopic gastroplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Conchillo JM; Schwartz MP; Selimah M; Samsom M; Arts J; Tack J; Sifrim D; Smout AJ Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Jul; 26(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 17555422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A quantitative assessment of results with the Angelchik prosthesis. Wyllie JH; Edwards DA Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 Jul; 67(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 4037629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux. López-Alonso M; Moya MJ; Cabo JA; Ribas J; del Carmen Macías M; Silny J; Sifrim D Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e299-308. PubMed ID: 16831894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Use of an endoscopic suturing device (the "ESD") to treat patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, after unsuccessful EndoCinch endoluminal gastroplication: another failure. Schiefke I; Neumann S; Zabel-Langhennig A; Moessner J; Caca K Endoscopy; 2005 Aug; 37(8):700-5. PubMed ID: 16032486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]