126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29229590)
1. The Swedish Web Version of the Quality of Recovery Scale Adapted for Use in a Mobile App: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study.
Nilsson U; Dahlberg K; Jaensson M
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Dec; 5(12):e188. PubMed ID: 29229590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Swedish Web Version of the Quality of Recovery Scale Adapted for Patients Undergoing Local Anesthesia and Peripheral Nerve Blockade (SwQoR-LA): Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study.
Nilsson U; Dahlberg K; Jaensson M
JMIR Perioper Med; 2021 Jan; 4(1):e23090. PubMed ID: 33448932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Swedish Web-Version of Quality of Recovery (SwQoR): Secondary Step in the Development of a Mobile Phone App to Measure Postoperative Recovery.
Dahlberg K; Jaensson M; Eriksson M; Nilsson U
JMIR Res Protoc; 2016 Sep; 5(3):e192. PubMed ID: 27679867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Development of the Recovery Assessments by Phone Points (RAPP): A Mobile Phone App for Postoperative Recovery Monitoring and Assessment.
Jaensson M; Dahlberg K; Eriksson M; Grönlund Å; Nilsson U
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2015 Sep; 3(3):e86. PubMed ID: 26362403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and reliability of quality of recovery-35 Thai version: a prospective questionnaire-based study.
Pitimana-Aree S; Udompanthurak S; Lapmahapaisan S; Tareerath M; Wangdee A
BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):64. PubMed ID: 27538900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.
Yoon S; Joo H; Oh YM; Lee J; Bahk JH; Lee HJ
Br J Anaesth; 2020 Oct; 125(4):614-621. PubMed ID: 32703550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15.
Stark PA; Myles PS; Burke JA
Anesthesiology; 2013 Jun; 118(6):1332-40. PubMed ID: 23411725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Swedish Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study Including Thresholds Levels.
Wångdahl J; Jaensson M; Dahlberg K; Nilsson U
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Feb; 8(2):e16316. PubMed ID: 32130168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Swedish version of Quality of Recovery score -15: a multicentre, cohort study.
Lyckner S; Böregård IL; Zetterlund EL; Chew MS
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2018 Aug; 62(7):893-902. PubMed ID: 29417552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.
Kleif J; Edwards HM; Sort R; Vilandt J; Gögenur I
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2015 Aug; 59(7):912-20. PubMed ID: 25867135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. RAPP, a systematic e-assessment of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing day surgery: study protocol for a mixed-methods study design including a multicentre, two-group, parallel, single-blind randomised controlled trial and qualitative interview studies.
Nilsson U; Jaensson M; Dahlberg K; Odencrants S; Grönlund Å; Hagberg L; Eriksson M
BMJ Open; 2016 Jan; 6(1):e009901. PubMed ID: 26769788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of postoperative recovery in day surgery patients using a mobile phone application: a multicentre randomized trial.
Jaensson M; Dahlberg K; Eriksson M; Nilsson U
Br J Anaesth; 2017 Nov; 119(5):1030-1038. PubMed ID: 29077818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sex Similarities in Postoperative Recovery and Health Care Contacts Within 14 Days With mHealth Follow-Up: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Jaensson M; Dahlberg K; Nilsson U
JMIR Perioper Med; 2018 Mar; 1(1):e2. PubMed ID: 33401367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Myles PS; Shulman MA; Reilly J; Kasza J; Romero L
Br J Anaesth; 2022 Jun; 128(6):1029-1039. PubMed ID: 35430086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40.
Myles PS; Weitkamp B; Jones K; Melick J; Hensen S
Br J Anaesth; 2000 Jan; 84(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 10740540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.
La Touche R; Pardo-Montero J; Gil-Martínez A; Paris-Alemany A; Angulo-Díaz-Parreño S; Suárez-Falcón JC; Lara-Lara M; Fernández-Carnero J
Pain Physician; 2014; 17(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 24452650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variability and reliability of the French version of the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire (QoR-40).
Vignaud M; Morel C; Henault A; Futier E; Pereira B; Lambert C; Beloeil H
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2021 Apr; 40(2):100822. PubMed ID: 33722740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of Arabic version of the postoperative quality of recovery-40 questionnaire.
Terkawi AS; Myles PS; Riad W; Nassar SN; Mahmoud M; AlKahtani GJ; Sala FJ; Abdulrahman A; Doais KS; Terkawi RS; Tsang S
Saudi J Anaesth; 2017 May; 11(Suppl 1):S40-S52. PubMed ID: 28616003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cultural adaptation, validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Swedish version of the effective musculoskeletal consumer scale (EC-17).
Bremander A; Wikström I; Larsson I; Bengtsson M; Hagel S; Strömbeck B
Musculoskeletal Care; 2012 Mar; 10(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 22302732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Psychometric evaluation of a quality of recovery score for the postanesthesia care unit-A preliminary validation study.
Kahl U; Brodersen K; Kaiser S; Krause L; Klinger R; Plümer L; Zöllner C; Fischer M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0289685. PubMed ID: 37582085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
