141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29230427)
1. Biomechanical Comparison of Single- Versus Double-Row Capsulolabral Repair for Shoulder Instability: A Review.
Yousif MJ; Bicos J
Orthop J Sports Med; 2017 Dec; 5(12):2325967117742355. PubMed ID: 29230427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Double-Row Capsulolabral Repair Increases Load to Failure and Decreases Excessive Motion.
McDonald LS; Thompson M; Altchek DW; McGarry MH; Lee TQ; Rocchi VJ; Dines JS
Arthroscopy; 2016 Nov; 32(11):2218-2225. PubMed ID: 27209626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-row versus double-row capsulolabral repair: a comparative evaluation of contact pressure and surface area in the capsulolabral complex-glenoid bone interface.
Kim DS; Yoon YS; Chung HJ
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Jul; 39(7):1500-6. PubMed ID: 21451167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Biomechanical, Cadaveric Evaluation of Single- Versus Double-Row Repair Techniques on Stability of Bony Bankart Lesions.
Greenstein AS; Chen RE; Knapp E; Brown AM; Roberts A; Awad HA; Voloshin I
Am J Sports Med; 2021 Mar; 49(3):773-779. PubMed ID: 33544626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Anatomic and Biomechanical Comparison of Bankart Repair Configurations.
Judson CH; Voss A; Obopilwe E; Dyrna F; Arciero RA; Shea KP
Am J Sports Med; 2017 Nov; 45(13):3004-3009. PubMed ID: 28777665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arthroscopic Double-Row Suture Anchor Repair of Acute Posterior Bony Bankart Lesion.
Ly JA; Coleman EM; Kropf EJ
Arthrosc Tech; 2016 Aug; 5(4):e839-e843. PubMed ID: 27709046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of glenoid capsulolabral complex insertional anatomy and restoration with single- and double-row capsulolabral repairs.
Ahmad CS; Galano GJ; Vorys GC; Covey AS; Gardner TR; Levine WN
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2009; 18(6):948-54. PubMed ID: 19546012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No difference in biomechanical properties of simple, horizontal mattress, and double row repair in Bankart repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of biomechanical studies.
Kim JH; Koo BK; Ku KH; Kim MS
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Sep; 24(1):765. PubMed ID: 37759194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chondral Damage After Arthroscopic Repair Techniques for Acute Bony Bankart Lesions: A Biomechanical Study.
Greenstein AS; Chen RE; Brown AM; Knapp E; Roberts A; Awad HA; Voloshin I
Am J Sports Med; 2021 Aug; 49(10):2743-2750. PubMed ID: 34236920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical Comparison of Arthroscopic Single- and Double-Row Repair Techniques for Acute Bony Bankart Lesions.
Spiegl UJ; Smith SD; Todd JN; Coatney GA; Wijdicks CA; Millett PJ
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1939-46. PubMed ID: 25023439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Double-Layer Rotator Cuff Repair: Anatomic Reconstruction of the Superior Capsule and Rotator Cuff Improves Biomechanical Properties in Repairs of Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears.
Pauzenberger L; Heuberer PR; Dyrna F; Obopilwe E; Kriegleder B; Anderl W; Mazzocca AD
Am J Sports Med; 2018 Nov; 46(13):3165-3173. PubMed ID: 30285460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Footprint fixation for arthroscopic reconstruction in anterior shoulder instability: the Cassiopeia double-row technique.
Lafosse L; Baier GP; Jost B
Arthroscopy; 2006 Feb; 22(2):231.e1-231.e6. PubMed ID: 16458815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional outcome of arthroscopic double row repair for Bankart lesion.
Wade R; Reddy P V B
J Orthop; 2018 Sep; 15(3):792-797. PubMed ID: 30013290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A biomechanical comparison of tendon-bone interface motion and cyclic loading between single-row, triple-loaded cuff repairs and double-row, suture-tape cuff repairs using biocomposite anchors.
Barber FA; Drew OR
Arthroscopy; 2012 Sep; 28(9):1197-205. PubMed ID: 22592123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of abduction and rotation on footprint contact for single-row, double-row, and modified double-row rotator cuff repair techniques.
Park MC; Pirolo JM; Park CJ; Tibone JE; McGarry MH; Lee TQ
Am J Sports Med; 2009 Aug; 37(8):1599-608. PubMed ID: 19417121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair.
Mazzocca AD; Millett PJ; Guanche CA; Santangelo SA; Arciero RA
Am J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1861-8. PubMed ID: 16210578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of single-row and double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.
Saridakis P; Jones G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):732-42. PubMed ID: 20194334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-row modified mason-allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison.
Nelson CO; Sileo MJ; Grossman MG; Serra-Hsu F
Arthroscopy; 2008 Aug; 24(8):941-8. PubMed ID: 18657744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Editorial Commentary: The Debate Over Double-Row Continues: Shoulder Arthroscopic Capsulolabral and Bankart Repair for Shoulder Instability.
Weber SC
Arthroscopy; 2016 Nov; 32(11):2226-2227. PubMed ID: 27816093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparable clinical outcomes using knotless and knot-tying anchors for arthroscopic capsulolabral repair in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability at mean 5-year follow-up.
Wu IT; Desai VS; Mangold DR; Camp CL; Barlow JD; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Dahm DL; Krych AJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Jul; 29(7):2077-2084. PubMed ID: 32462270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
