These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29231050)
1. Follow-up interval for probably benign breast lesions on screening ultrasound in women at average risk for breast cancer with dense breasts. Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1045-1050. PubMed ID: 29231050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retroareolar masses and intraductal abnormalities detected on screening ultrasound: can biopsy be avoided? Guo Y; Raghu M; Durand M; Hooley R Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170816. PubMed ID: 29338316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Follow-Up Intervals for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions on Screening Ultrasound in Screening and Tertiary Referral Centers. Huh S; Suh HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Park VY; Moon HJ Korean J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 21(9):1027-1035. PubMed ID: 32691538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography. Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiologist-performed hand-held ultrasound screening at average risk of breast cancer: results from a single health screening center. Chang JM; Koo HR; Moon WK Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):652-8. PubMed ID: 24951614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Supplementary breast ultrasound screening in Asian women with negative but dense mammograms-a pilot study. Leong LC; Gogna A; Pant R; Ng FC; Sim LS Ann Acad Med Singap; 2012 Oct; 41(10):432-9. PubMed ID: 23138139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts. Zhang Z; Wang W; Wang X; Yu X; Zhu Y; Zhan H; Chen Z; Li B; Huang J Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6062-6071. PubMed ID: 32524221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts. Kim SY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5279. PubMed ID: 27858896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected with Screening Mammography versus US: Factors Associated with Second Breast Cancer. Choi SH; Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Ko ES; Park KW Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 31038406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of a short-term imaging follow-up after a benign result in a one-stop breast unit: Is it still useful? Daroles J; Borget I; Suciu V; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Balleyguier C Eur J Cancer; 2017 Nov; 85():23-30. PubMed ID: 28881248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound screening of contralateral breast after surgery for breast cancer. Kim SJ; Chung SY; Chang JM; Cho N; Han W; Moon WK Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25458226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. Brem RF; Tabár L; Duffy SW; Inciardi MF; Guingrich JA; Hashimoto BE; Lander MR; Lapidus RL; Peterson MK; Rapelyea JA; Roux S; Schilling KJ; Shah BA; Torrente J; Wynn RT; Miller DP Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 25329763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Potential Impact of Risk-Based Screening Mammography in Women 40-49 Years Old. Price ER; Keedy AW; Gidwaney R; Sickles EA; Joe BN AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1360-4. PubMed ID: 26204111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in breast biopsy pathology diagnoses among women undergoing mammography in the United States: a report from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Allison KH; Abraham LA; Weaver DL; Tosteson AN; Nelson HD; Onega T; Geller BM; Kerlikowske K; Carney PA; Ichikawa LE; Buist DS; Elmore JG Cancer; 2015 May; 121(9):1369-78. PubMed ID: 25603785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer detection using sonography in women with mammographically dense breasts. Okello J; Kisembo H; Bugeza S; Galukande M BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Dec; 14():41. PubMed ID: 25547239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458. Parris T; Wakefield D; Frimmer H Breast J; 2013; 19(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 23240937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]