118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 292313)
1. Patient radiation dose in conventional and xerographic cephalography.
Copley RL; Glaze SA; Bushong SC; West DC
Am J Orthod; 1979 Nov; 76(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 292313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A critical evaluation of xerocephalometry: absorbed dose and diagnostic information.
Kaugars GE; Fatouros PP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Apr; 57(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 6584844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Soft tissue xeroradiography of the shoulder joint.
Reichmann S; Astrand K; Deichgräber E; Olsson B
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1975 Nov; 16(6):572-6. PubMed ID: 1217522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Xeroradiography of dental structures. II. Image analysis.
Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Parks CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Jul; 46(1):156-65. PubMed ID: 277872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Xero and film mammography: two images with one exposure.
Wyatt CC
Radiol Technol; 1980; 51(5):621-5. PubMed ID: 7384431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Possibilities of dose reduction in lateral cephalometric radiographs and its effects on clinical diagnostics.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17329587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoral xeroradiography.
White SC; Stafford ML; Beeninga LR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Dec; 46(6):862-70. PubMed ID: 282550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of a "sandwich" technique to control image geometry in clinical studies comparing intraoral xeroradiographs and E-speed films.
Ludlow JB; Hill RA; Hayes CJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 3163790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Film and xeroradiographic images in mammography. A comparison of tungsten and molybdenum anode materials.
Evans AL; James WB; McLellan J; Davison M
Br J Radiol; 1975 Dec; 48(576):968-72. PubMed ID: 1218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Landmark identification accuracy in xeroradiographic cephalometry.
Hurst RV; Schwaninger B; Shaye R; Chadha JM
Am J Orthod; 1978 May; 73(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 277070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiologic exposure conditions and resultant skin doses in application of xeroradiography to the orthodontic diagnosis.
Nakasima A; Nakata S; Shimizu K; Takahama Y
Am J Orthod; 1980 Dec; 78(6):646-56. PubMed ID: 6935964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation absorbed doses in cephalography.
Eliasson S; Julin P; Richter S; Stenström B
Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 6585997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensitometric characteristics of dental xeroradiography.
Gratt BM; Sickles EA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Nov; 56(5):555-9. PubMed ID: 6580602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical assessment of anatomic positioning and patient comfort for intraoral radiography: a comparison of xeroradiography versus film.
Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Forsythe AA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Aug; 64(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 3476902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of x-radiation doses between conventional and rare earth panoramic radiographic techniques.
Skoczylas LJ; Preece JW; Langlais RP; McDavid WD; Waggener RG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):776-81. PubMed ID: 2594329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Xeroradiography. Technic, methodology, and image characteristics].
Zocchi M
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1982; 83(2-3):103-6. PubMed ID: 6954613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Dosimetric evaluations in dental radiology: comparison of the digital system and the conventional system].
Blanc M; Nessi R; Paruccini N; Castellana L
Radiol Med; 1995 Mar; 89(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 7754128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Xeroradiography for imaging biomaterials--A comparison with conventional radiography.
Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Lacy AM
J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Nov; 44(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 6934294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
