These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29232267)

  • 1. Concomitant Anterior Repair, Preoperative Prolapse Severity, and Anatomic Prolapse Outcomes After Vaginal Apical Procedures.
    Nager CW; Grimes CL; Nolen TL; Wai CY; Brubaker L; Jeppson PC; Wilson TS; Visco AG; Barber MD; Sutkin G; Norton P; Rardin CR; Arya L; Wallace D; Meikle SF;
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29232267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
    JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination Ba and D Guide the Selection of Operation for Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse?
    Li C; Shu H; Dai Z
    J Invest Surg; 2020 Jun; 33(5):438-445. PubMed ID: 30574821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension.
    Sutkin G; Zyczynski HM; Sridhar A; Jelovsek JE; Rardin CR; Mazloomdoost D; Rahn DD; Nguyen JN; Andy UU; Meyer I; Gantz MG;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):161.e1-161.e8. PubMed ID: 31449806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
    Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
    Barber MD; Brubaker L; Burgio KL; Richter HE; Nygaard I; Weidner AC; Menefee SA; Lukacz ES; Norton P; Schaffer J; Nguyen JN; Borello-France D; Goode PS; Jakus-Waldman S; Spino C; Warren LK; Gantz MG; Meikle SF;
    JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(10):1023-34. PubMed ID: 24618964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined anterior vaginal wall mesh with sacrospinous ligament fixation or with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse.
    Heinonen PK; Nieminen K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 21561703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of native tissue transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.
    Meyer I; Whitworth RE; Lukacz ES; Smith AL; Sung VW; Visco AG; Ackenbom MF; Wai CY; Mazloomdoost D; Gantz MG; Richter HE;
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2155-2164. PubMed ID: 32146521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Examination D Point Predict Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Outcomes?
    Richter LA; Park AJ; Boileau JE; Janni M; Desale S; Iglesia CB
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 26829342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
    Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Schulten SF; Detollenaere RJ; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; Van Eijndhoven HW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):252.e1-252.e9. PubMed ID: 35439530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of the anterior approach versus posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Bastani P; Tayebi S; Ghabousian A; Salehi-Pourmehr H; Hajebrahimi S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1857-1862. PubMed ID: 35347369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Five-year surgical outcomes of transvaginal apical approaches in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse.
    Meyer I; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Richter HE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Sep; 34(9):2171-2181. PubMed ID: 37039859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Prospective cohort study on the outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation using conventional instruments in treating stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
    Ren C; Song XC; Zhu L; Ai FF; Shi HH; Sun ZJ; Chen J; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):369-373. PubMed ID: 28647958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of perioperative vaginal estrogen as adjunct to native tissue vaginal apical prolapse repair.
    Rahn DD; Richter HE; Sung VW; Pruszynski JE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 231(2):263.e1-263.e10. PubMed ID: 38710269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anterior repair versus no anterior repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse resolved under simulated apical support at the time of uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Lee SY; Jeon MJ
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2043-2049. PubMed ID: 32047967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perioperative Vaginal Estrogen as Adjunct to Native Tissue Vaginal Apical Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Rahn DD; Richter HE; Sung VW; Pruszynski JE; Hynan LS
    JAMA; 2023 Aug; 330(7):615-625. PubMed ID: 37581673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
    Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.