156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29232667)
1. Correlation between Subpubic Arch Angle and Mode of Delivery in Large-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses.
Ghi T; Dall'Asta A; Suprani A; Aiello E; Musarò A; Bosi C; Pedrazzi G; Kiener A; Arduini D; Frusca T; Rizzo G
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2018; 44(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 29232667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Narrow subpubic arch angle is associated with higher risk of persistent occiput posterior position at delivery.
Ghi T; Youssef A; Martelli F; Bellussi F; Aiello E; Pilu G; Rizzo N; Frusca T; Arduini D; Rizzo G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 48(4):511-515. PubMed ID: 26565728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal head circumference and subpubic angle are independent risk factors for unplanned cesarean and operative delivery.
Rizzo G; Aiello E; Bosi C; D'Antonio F; Arduini D
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Aug; 96(8):1006-1011. PubMed ID: 28449356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subpubic Arch Angle and Mode of Delivery in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.
Youssef A; Ghi T; Martelli F; Montaguti E; Salsi G; Bellussi F; Pilu G; Rizzo N
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2016; 40(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 26555940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification of large-for-gestational age fetuses using antenatal customized fetal growth charts: Can we improve the prediction of abnormal labor course?
Dall'Asta A; Rizzo G; Kiener A; Volpe N; Di Pasquo E; Roletti E; Mappa I; Makatsariya A; Maruotti GM; Saccone G; Sarno L; Papaccio M; Fichera A; Prefumo F; Ottaviani C; Stampalija T; Frusca T; Ghi T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 May; 248():81-88. PubMed ID: 32199297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound.
Dall'Asta A; Angeli L; Masturzo B; Volpe N; Schera GBL; Di Pasquo E; Girlando F; Attini R; Menato G; Frusca T; Ghi T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):642.e1-642.e13. PubMed ID: 31589867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between bituberous diameter and mode of delivery in a cohort of low-risk nulliparous women.
Neri S; Di Pasquo E; Corrado NA; Frati F; Dardari M; Mancini M; Pedrazzi G; Ramirez Zegarra R; Ghi T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Aug; 287():75-79. PubMed ID: 37300981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of subpubic arch angle by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and impact on vaginal delivery.
Albrich SB; Shek K; Krahn U; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 25678020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of cesarean delivery in the term nulliparous woman: results from the prospective, multicenter Genesis study.
Burke N; Burke G; Breathnach F; McAuliffe F; Morrison JJ; Turner M; Dornan S; Higgins JR; Cotter A; Geary M; McParland P; Daly S; Cody F; Dicker P; Tully E; Malone FD;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):598.e1-598.e11. PubMed ID: 28213060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The "occiput-spine angle": a new sonographic index of fetal head deflexion during the first stage of labor.
Ghi T; Bellussi F; Azzarone C; Krsmanovic J; Franchi L; Youssef A; Lenzi J; Fantini MP; Frusca T; Pilu G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 215(1):84.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26880733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.
Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 21308837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
Rozenberg P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4500 grams: Los Angeles County + University of Southern California experience.
Lipscomb KR; Gregory K; Shaw K
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):558-64. PubMed ID: 7898833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sonographic large fetal head circumference and risk of cesarean delivery.
Lipschuetz M; Cohen SM; Israel A; Baron J; Porat S; Valsky DV; Yagel O; Amsalem H; Kabiri D; Gilboa Y; Sivan E; Unger R; Schiff E; Hershkovitz R; Yagel S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 218(3):339.e1-339.e7. PubMed ID: 29305249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?
Kalache KD; Dückelmann AM; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Cichon G; Dudenhausen JW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 19224527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Elective induction versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia.
Combs CA; Singh NB; Khoury JC
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Apr; 81(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 8459954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetus.
Weiner Z; Ben-Shlomo I; Beck-Fruchter R; Goldberg Y; Shalev E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2002 Oct; 105(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 12270559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Delivery management for the prevention of shoulder dystocia in case of identified risk factors].
Schmitz T
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Dec; 44(10):1261-71. PubMed ID: 26530180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Fetal macrosomia and mode of delivery].
Diani F; Moscatelli C; Toppano B; Turinetto A
Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Mar; 47(3):77-82. PubMed ID: 7630513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome.
Bjørstad AR; Irgens-Hansen K; Daltveit AK; Irgens LM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):664-9. PubMed ID: 20235897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
