159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29232667)
21. Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome.
Bjørstad AR; Irgens-Hansen K; Daltveit AK; Irgens LM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):664-9. PubMed ID: 20235897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Gillor M; Vaisbuch E; Zaks S; Barak O; Hagay Z; Levy R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 27062415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Investigation on the approach of delivery after previous cesarean section of Xinjiang Uyghur women].
Ding X; Aimainilezi A; Jin Y; Abudula W; Yin C
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):736-40. PubMed ID: 25537243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Which way is better to deliver the very heavy baby: mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcome.
Levin G; Meyer R; Yagel S; David M; Yinon Y; Rottenstreich A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Apr; 301(4):941-948. PubMed ID: 32125523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Universal vs selective ultrasonography to screen for large-for-gestational-age infants and associated morbidity.
Sovio U; Moraitis AA; Wong HS; Smith GCS
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):783-791. PubMed ID: 28425156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pubic Arch Angle Measurement by Transperineal Ultrasonography: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Carvalho Neto RH; Viana Junior AB; Moron AF; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho FHC; Feitosa HN
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2020 Apr; 42(4):181-187. PubMed ID: 32330959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.
Ghi T; Maroni E; Youssef A; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Montaguti E; Rizzo N; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 24496823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Induction of labor versus expectant management of large-for-gestational-age infants in nulliparous women.
Moldéus K; Cheng YW; Wikström AK; Stephansson O
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180748. PubMed ID: 28727729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pregnancy outcome following ultrasound diagnosis of macrosomia.
Delpapa EH; Mueller-Heubach E
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):340-3. PubMed ID: 1876361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sonographic markers of fetal adiposity and risk of Cesarean delivery.
Hehir MP; Burke N; Burke G; Turner MJ; Breathnach FM; Mcauliffe FM; Morrison JJ; Dornan S; Higgins J; Cotter A; Geary MP; Mcparland P; Daly S; Cody F; Dicker P; Tully E; Malone FD
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):338-343. PubMed ID: 30887629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Association between fetal position at onset of labor and mode of delivery: a prospective cohort study.
Ahmad A; Webb SS; Early B; Sitch A; Khan K; Macarthur C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 23929533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance.
Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z; Spira M; Kedem A; Katorza E; Moran O; Achiron R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 23001876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Can angle of progression in pregnant women before onset of labor predict mode of delivery?
Levy R; Zaks S; Ben-Arie A; Perlman S; Hagay Z; Vaisbuch E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 22605649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Role of fetal head-circumference-to-maternal-height ratio in predicting Cesarean section for labor dystocia: prospective multicenter study.
Dall'Asta A; Ramirez Zegarra R; Corno E; Mappa I; Lu JLA; Di Pasquo E; Morganelli G; Abou-Dakn M; Germano C; Attini R; Masturzo B; Rizzo G; Ghi T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 61(1):93-98. PubMed ID: 35767709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Obstetric consequences of a false-positive diagnosis of large-for-gestational-age fetus.
Papaccio M; Fichera A; Nava A; Zatti S; Gerosa V; Ferrari F; Sartori E; Prefumo F; Fratelli N
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 158(3):626-633. PubMed ID: 34825356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Antepartum ultrasound prediction of failed vacuum-assisted operative delivery: a prospective cohort study.
Rizzo G; Mattioli C; Mappa I; Bitsadze V; Khizroeva J; Makatsariya A; D'Antonio F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Oct; 34(20):3323-3329. PubMed ID: 31718394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Risk factors and clinical prediction of shoulder dystocia in non-macrosomia].
Li N; Li Q; Chang L; Liu C
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 50(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25877419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mode of delivery and outcomes by birth weight among spontaneous and induced singleton cephalic nulliparous labors.
Walsh JM; Hehir MP; Robson MS; Mahony RM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 129(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 25575424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Choosing route of delivery for the macrosomic infant of a diabetic mother: Cesarean section versus vaginal delivery.
Conway DL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2002 Dec; 12(6):442-8. PubMed ID: 12683659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
