383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29233096)
21. External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Anchu AC; Mohsina S; Sureshkumar S; Mahalakshmy T; Kate V
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 36(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 28393330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?
Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW
Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Thanapirom K; Ridtitid W; Rerknimitr R; Thungsuk R; Noophun P; Wongjitrat C; Luangjaru S; Vedkijkul P; Lertkupinit C; Poonsab S; Ratanachu-ek T; Hansomburana P; Pornthisarn B; Thongbai T; Mahachai V; Treeprasertsuk S
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Apr; 31(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 26514879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Saffouri E; Blackwell C; Laursen SB; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Shultz M; Norton R; Stanley AJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Jan; 51(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 31642558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
Rout G; Sharma S; Gunjan D; Kedia S; Nayak B; Shalimar
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?
Reed EA; Dalton H; Blatchford O; Ashley D; Mowat C; Gaya DR; Cahill A; Warshow U; Hare N; Groome M; Forrest EH; Morris J; Stanley AJ
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 26(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 24535596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Pre-Endoscopic C-WATCH Score with Established Risk Assessment Tools in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Allo G; Bürger M; Gillessen J; Kasper P; Franklin J; Mück V; Nierhoff D; Steffen HM; Goeser T; Schramm C
Dig Dis; 2022; 40(6):826-834. PubMed ID: 35073555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the quick SOFA score with Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scores in predicting severity in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Taslidere B; Sonmez E; Özcan AB; Mehmetaj L; Keskin EB; Gulen B
Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 45():29-36. PubMed ID: 33647759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Blatchford score is a useful tool for predicting the need for intervention in cancer patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Ahn S; Lim KS; Lee YS; Lee JL
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Aug; 28(8):1288-94. PubMed ID: 23432611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation of a new risk score system for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kim MS; Moon HS; Kwon IS; Park JH; Kim JS; Kang SH; Sung JK; Lee ES; Kim SH; Lee BS; Jeong HY
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):193. PubMed ID: 32552662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall Scores for prediction of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding outcomes in Chinese patients.
Lu M; Sun G; Huang H; Zhang X; Xu Y; Chen S; Song Y; Li X; Lv B; Ren J; Chen X; Zhang H; Mo C; Wang Y; Yang Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(21):e15716. PubMed ID: 31124950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Scoring systems used to predict mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ED.
Tang Y; Shen J; Zhang F; Zhou X; Tang Z; You T
Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28673695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development, Validation, and Comparative Assessment of an International Scoring System to Determine Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Oakland K; Kahan BC; Guizzetti L; Martel M; Bryant RV; Brahmania M; Singh S; Nguyen NQ; Sey MSL; Barkun A; Jairath V
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 17(6):1121-1129.e2. PubMed ID: 30268566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland.
Rivieri S; Carron PN; Schoepfer A; Ageron FX
Eur J Emerg Med; 2023 Feb; 30(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 36542335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. External validation of Glasgow-Blatchford, modified Glasgow-Blatchford and CANUKA scores to identify low-risk patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study.
Pognonec C; Dirhoussi Z; Cury N; Moreau M; Billard C; Yordanov Y; Thiebaud PC
Emerg Med J; 2023 Jun; 40(6):451-457. PubMed ID: 37185303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The prognostic significance of the risk scores at upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Uysal Y; Babus SB; Kose A; Ates F; Biricik S; Erdogan S; Cevik I; Toker I; Ayrik C
Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Aug; 22(8):1099-1108. PubMed ID: 31417053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?
Budimir I; Stojsavljević S; Baršić N; Bišćanin A; Mirošević G; Bohnec S; Kirigin LS; Pavić T; Ljubičić N
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 23(41):7450-7458. PubMed ID: 29151699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
