These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29233394)
1. Validity and reliability of an application review process using dedicated reviewers in one stage of a multi-stage admissions model. Zeeman JM; McLaughlin JE; Cox WC Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017 Nov; 9(6):972-979. PubMed ID: 29233394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inter-rater reliability of a reflective rubric to assess pharmacy students' reflective thinking. Lucas C; Bosnic-Anticevich S; Schneider CR; Bartimote-Aufflick K; McEntee M; Smith L Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017 Nov; 9(6):989-995. PubMed ID: 29233396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Multiple Mini-Interview as an Admission Tool for a PharmD Program Satellite Campus. Singer D; McLaughlin JE; Cox WC Am J Pharm Educ; 2016 Sep; 80(7):121. PubMed ID: 27756929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Candidate Evaluation Using Targeted Construct Assessment in the Multiple Mini-Interview: A Multifaceted Rasch Model Analysis. McLaughlin JE; Singer D; Cox WC Teach Learn Med; 2017; 29(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 27466859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of Interrater Reliability of a Universal Evaluator Rubric to Assess Student Pharmacist Communication Skills. Barnett SG; Allen SM; Bastianelli KM; Chen JS; Clark Dula CA; Kachlic MD; Goliak KL; Knockel LE; Matthews DE; Volino LR; Lasarev MR; Reist JC Am J Pharm Educ; 2022 Jan; 86(1):8544. PubMed ID: 34301546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Becoming more holistic: A literature review of nonacademic factors in the admissions process of colleges and schools of pharmacy and other health professions. Choi AN; Flowers SK; Heldenbrand SD Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Oct; 10(10):1429-1437. PubMed ID: 30527373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of an interview process for admission into a school of pharmacy. Kelsch MP; Friesner DL Am J Pharm Educ; 2012 Mar; 76(2):22. PubMed ID: 22438594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ability of admissions criteria to predict early academic performance among students of health science colleges at King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. Alhadlaq AM; Alshammari OF; Alsager SM; Neel KA; Mohamed AG J Dent Educ; 2015 Jun; 79(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 26034031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified personal interviews: resurrecting reliable personal interviews for admissions? Hanson MD; Kulasegaram KM; Woods NN; Fechtig L; Anderson G Acad Med; 2012 Oct; 87(10):1330-4. PubMed ID: 22914517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Should candidate scores be adjusted for interviewer stringency or leniency in the multiple mini-interview? Roberts C; Rothnie I; Zoanetti N; Crossley J Med Educ; 2010 Jul; 44(7):690-8. PubMed ID: 20636588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A standardized rubric to evaluate student presentations. Peeters MJ; Sahloff EG; Stone GE Am J Pharm Educ; 2010 Nov; 74(9):171. PubMed ID: 21301605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MOR: a simulation-based assessment centre for evaluating the personal and interpersonal qualities of medical school candidates. Ziv A; Rubin O; Moshinsky A; Gafni N; Kotler M; Dagan Y; Lichtenberg D; Mekori YA; Mittelman M Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 42(10):991-8. PubMed ID: 18823518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Norming a VALUE rubric to assess graduate information literacy skills. Turbow DJ; Evener J J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Jul; 104(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 27366121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The structured interview and interviewer training in the admissions process. Joyner PU; Cox WC; White-Harris C; Blalock SJ Am J Pharm Educ; 2007 Oct; 71(5):83. PubMed ID: 17998980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting performance in health professions education programs from admissions information - Comparisons of other health professions with pharmacy. Wilcox RE; Lawson KA Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Apr; 10(4):529-541. PubMed ID: 29793718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can a reflective rubric be applied consistently with raters globally? A study across three countries. Lucas C; Smith L; Lonie JM; Hough M; Rogers K; Mantzourani E Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Oct; 11(10):987-994. PubMed ID: 31685182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can rasch analysis enhance the abstract ranking process in scientific conferences? Issues of interrater variability and abstract rating burden. Scanlan JN; Lannin NA; Hoffmann T J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2015; 35(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 25799969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of student performance on the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment at a new school of pharmacy using admissions and demographic data. Gillette C; Rudolph M; Rockich-Winston N; Blough ER; Sizemore JA; Hao J; Booth C; Broedel-Zaugg K; Peterson M; Anderson S; Riley B; Train BC; Stanton RB; Anderson HG Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017; 9(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 29180160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and validity of admissions tools used to select students for the health professions. Salvatori P Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2001; 6(2):159-75. PubMed ID: 11435766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]