117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29235449)
1. Evaluation of skin absorbed doses during manipulation of radioactive sources: a comparison between the VARSKIN code and Monte Carlo simulations.
Amato E; Italiano A
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):262-272. PubMed ID: 29235449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of the photon dose calculation model in the VARSKIN 4 skin dose computer code.
Sherbini S; Decicco J; Struckmeyer R; Saba M; Bush-Goddard S
Health Phys; 2012 Dec; 103(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 23111523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Verification of the VARSKIN beta skin dose calculation computer code.
Sherbini S; DeCicco J; Gray AT; Struckmeyer R
Health Phys; 2008 Jun; 94(6):527-38. PubMed ID: 18469586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiation protection from external exposure to radionuclides: A Monte Carlo data handbook.
Amato E; Italiano A; Auditore L; Baldari S
Phys Med; 2018 Feb; 46():160-167. PubMed ID: 29519404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A COMPARISON OF BETA SKIN DOSES CALCULATED WITH VARSKIN 5.35.3 AND MCNP5.
Dubeau J; Hakmana Witharana SS; Sun J; Heinmiller BE; Chase WJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):502-507. PubMed ID: 30053277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimising cylinder model dimensions for VARSKIN to simulate a droplet of radionuclide skin contamination using Geant4 Monte Carlo code.
James G; O'Brien J; Thomson B
Nucl Med Commun; 2023 May; 44(5):366-374. PubMed ID: 36897054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo calculation and silicon detector measurement of the hot particle dose.
Chung MH; Levine SH; Jester WA
Health Phys; 1991 Dec; 61(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 1955329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skin dose contamination conversion coefficients. Benchmark with three simulation codes.
Frosio T; Bertreix P; Menaa N; Thomas S; Eberhardt H; Endres J
J Radiol Prot; 2022 Jan; 42(1):. PubMed ID: 34801994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PERFORMANCE OF THE VARSKIN 5 (v5.3) ELECTRON DOSIMETRY MODEL.
Anspach LJ; Hamby DM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Oct; 181(2):111-119. PubMed ID: 29378064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A dose point kernel database using GATE Monte Carlo simulation toolkit for nuclear medicine applications: comparison with other Monte Carlo codes.
Papadimitroulas P; Loudos G; Nikiforidis GC; Kagadis GC
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5238-47. PubMed ID: 22894448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skin dose from radionuclide contamination on clothing.
Taylor DC; Hussein EM; Yuen PS
Health Phys; 1997 Jun; 72(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 9169925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The new VARSKIN 4 photon skin dosimetry model.
Hamby DM; Lodwick CJ; Palmer TS; Reese SR; Higley KA; Caffrey JA; Sherbini S; Saba M; Bush-Goddard SP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 154(3):356-63. PubMed ID: 23070483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo simulation of beta particle-induced bremsstrahlung doses.
Mrdja D; Bikit K; Bikit I; Slivka J; Forkapic S; Knezevic J
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):34-47. PubMed ID: 29019337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calculation of electron and isotopes dose point kernels with FLUKA Monte Carlo code for dosimetry in nuclear medicine therapy.
Botta F; Mairani A; Battistoni G; Cremonesi M; Di Dia A; Fassò A; Ferrari A; Ferrari M; Paganelli G; Pedroli G; Valente M
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):3944-54. PubMed ID: 21858991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A fast method for rescaling voxel S values for arbitrary voxel sizes in targeted radionuclide therapy from a single Monte Carlo calculation.
Fernández M; Hänscheid H; Mauxion T; Bardiès M; Kletting P; Glatting G; Lassmann M
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082502. PubMed ID: 23927347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limitations of the TG-43 formalism for skin high-dose-rate brachytherapy dose calculations.
Granero D; Perez-Calatayud J; Vijande J; Ballester F; Rivard MJ
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021703. PubMed ID: 24506594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calculation of cellular S-values using Geant4-DNA: The effect of cell geometry.
Šefl M; Incerti S; Papamichael G; Emfietzoglou D
Appl Radiat Isot; 2015 Oct; 104():113-23. PubMed ID: 26159660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of electron dose-point kernels in water generated by the Monte Carlo codes, PENELOPE, GEANT4, MCNPX, and ETRAN.
Uusijärvi H; Chouin N; Bernhardt P; Ferrer L; Bardiès M; Forssell-Aronsson E
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2009 Aug; 24(4):461-7. PubMed ID: 19694581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EGSnrc-based Monte Carlo dosimetry of CSA1 and CSA2 137Cs brachytherapy source models.
Selvam TP; Sahoo S; Vishwakarma RS
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3870-9. PubMed ID: 19810459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
