These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2923585)

  • 1. Detuning of cochlear action potential tuning curves at high sound pressure levels: influence of temporal, spectral and intensity variables.
    Henry KR
    Audiology; 1989; 28(1):19-36. PubMed ID: 2923585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compound action potential offset and onset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking in the mongolian gerbil. Effects of varying the intensity of the probe stimulus from 55 to 85 dB SPL.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1987; 30(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 3680053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Offset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking are more finely tuned than those generated by forward masking.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1986; 24(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3771377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Latency and amplitude compound action potential tuning curves for tonal stimuli with nontraditional envelopes.
    Henry KR; Sweet RJ; Szymanski MD
    Audiology; 1991; 30(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 2059168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Latency and amplitude tuning curves of the N1 and N2 components of the cochlear nerve compound action potential.
    Henry KR; Sweet RJ; Price JM
    Audiology; 1990; 29(3):122-34. PubMed ID: 2383212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory nerve neurophonic tuning curves produced by masking of round window responses.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):167-76. PubMed ID: 9119760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tuning curves of the difference tone auditory nerve neurophonic.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 99(1-2):160-7. PubMed ID: 8970824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Offset AP masker tuning curve and the FFT of the stimulus.
    Henry KR; Lewis ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1354-62. PubMed ID: 3198871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tuning of the auditory brainstem OFF responses is complementary to tuning of the auditory brainstem ON response.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 4055531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forward masking and unmasking of the offset cochlear compound action potential of the gerbil: comparison with suppression areas of the onset cochlear compound action potential.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1987; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 3680048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Derived and enhanced compound action potentials at near-threshold levels: forward masking increases sensitivity of audiograms and tuning curves.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1992 Nov; 63(1-2):12-8. PubMed ID: 1464566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear threshold assessment using tone-derived action potentials.
    Salt AN; Vora AR
    Audiology; 1990; 29(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 2383213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancement of the cochlear nerve compound action potential: sharply defined frequency-intensity domains bordering the tuning curve.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1991 Nov; 56(1-2):239-45. PubMed ID: 1769917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mass Potentials Recorded at the Round Window Enable the Detection of Low Spontaneous Rate Fibers in Gerbil Auditory Nerve.
    Batrel C; Huet A; Hasselmann F; Wang J; Desmadryl G; Nouvian R; Puel JL; Bourien J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169890. PubMed ID: 28085968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modulation of cochlear tuning by low-frequency sound.
    Klis JF; Prijs VF; Latour JB; Smoorenburg GF
    Hear Res; 1988 Nov; 36(2-3):163-73. PubMed ID: 3209489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of cochlear hearing loss and probe tone level on compound action potential tuning curves in humans.
    Rutten WL
    Hear Res; 1986; 21(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 3722003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency selectivity in the auditory periphery: similarities between damaged and developing ears.
    Walsh EJ; McGee J
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1990; 11(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 2321707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cochlear action potential tuning curves recorded with a derived response technique.
    Salt AN; Garcia P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1392-402. PubMed ID: 2229674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory steady-state evoked potentials vs. compound action potentials for the measurement of suppression tuning curves in the sedated dog puppy.
    Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Hoonhorst I; Collet G; Deltenre P; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):455-62. PubMed ID: 20482293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady state evoked potentials: a proof-of-concept study.
    Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Coppens A; Hoonhorst I; Kadhim H; Deltenre P
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 19125026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.