These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29238407)

  • 1. Scientists' Understandings of Risk of Nanomaterials: Disciplinary Culture Through the Ethnographic Lens.
    Johansson M; Boholm Å
    Nanoethics; 2017; 11(3):229-242. PubMed ID: 29238407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scientists' Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research.
    Corley EA; Kim Y; Scheufele DA
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):111-32. PubMed ID: 25721444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology.
    Corley EA; Scheufele DA; Hu Q
    J Nanopart Res; 2009 Oct; 11(7):1573-1585. PubMed ID: 21170136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.
    J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37235796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientists versus regulators: precaution, novelty & regulatory oversight as predictors of perceived risks of engineered nanomaterials.
    Beaudrie CE; Satterfield T; Kandlikar M; Harthorn BH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106365. PubMed ID: 25222742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
    Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How scientists become experts-or don't: Social organization of research and engagement in scientific advice in a toxicology laboratory.
    Demortain D
    Soc Stud Sci; 2024 Jun; 54(3):405-428. PubMed ID: 37897309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Planning Implications Related to Sterilization-Sensitive Science Investigations Associated with Mars Sample Return (MSR).
    Velbel MA; Cockell CS; Glavin DP; Marty B; Regberg AB; Smith AL; Tosca NJ; Wadhwa M; Kminek G; Meyer MA; Beaty DW; Carrier BL; Haltigin T; Hays LE; Agee CB; Busemann H; Cavalazzi B; Debaille V; Grady MM; Hauber E; Hutzler A; McCubbin FM; Pratt LM; Smith CL; Summons RE; Swindle TD; Tait KT; Udry A; Usui T; Westall F; Zorzano MP
    Astrobiology; 2022 Jun; 22(S1):S112-S164. PubMed ID: 34904892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Politics and scientific expertise: scientists, risk perception, and nuclear waste policy.
    Barke RP; Jenkins-Smith HC
    Risk Anal; 1993 Aug; 13(4):425-39. PubMed ID: 8234951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring Scientists' Values by Analyzing How They Frame Nature and Uncertainty.
    Vazquez M; McIlroy-Young B; Steel D; Giang A; Öberg G
    Risk Anal; 2021 Nov; 41(11):2094-2111. PubMed ID: 33598966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. International scientists' priorities for research on pharmaceutical and personal care products in the environment.
    Rudd MA; Ankley GT; Boxall AB; Brooks BW
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Oct; 10(4):576-87. PubMed ID: 24954797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should We All be Scientists? Re-thinking Laboratory Research as a Calling.
    Bezuidenhout L; Warne NA
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1161-1179. PubMed ID: 28726028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Solving challenges in inter- and trans-disciplinary working teams: Lessons from the surgical technology field.
    Korb W; Geißler N; Strauß G
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 25726137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Regulatory landscape of nanotechnology and nanoplastics from a global perspective.
    Allan J; Belz S; Hoeveler A; Hugas M; Okuda H; Patri A; Rauscher H; Silva P; Slikker W; Sokull-Kluettgen B; Tong W; Anklam E
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Jun; 122():104885. PubMed ID: 33617940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safe and Sound? Scientists' Understandings of Public Engagement in Emerging Biotechnologies.
    Braun M; Starkbaum J; Dabrock P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145033. PubMed ID: 26660160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doing laboratory ethnography: reflections on method in scientific workplaces.
    Stephens N; Lewis J
    Qual Res; 2017 Apr; 17(2):202-216. PubMed ID: 28546784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Building Open Access to Research (OAR) Data Infrastructure at NIST.
    Greene G; Plante R; Hanisch R
    Data Sci J; 2019; 18():. PubMed ID: 31579260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.