410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29238867)
1. A direct comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection and prediction of aggressiveness.
Baur ADJ; Schwabe J; Rogasch J; Maxeiner A; Penzkofer T; Stephan C; Rudl M; Hamm B; Jung EM; Fischer T
Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1949-1960. PubMed ID: 29238867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High spatiotemporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI improves the image-based discrimination of histopathology risk groups of peripheral zone prostate cancer: a supervised machine learning approach.
Winkel DJ; Breit HC; Block TK; Boll DT; Heye TJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Sep; 30(9):4828-4837. PubMed ID: 32328763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DCE-MRI of the prostate using shutter-speed vs. Tofts model for tumor characterization and assessment of aggressiveness.
Hectors SJ; Besa C; Wagner M; Jajamovich GH; Haines GK; Lewis S; Tewari A; Rastinehad A; Huang W; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):837-849. PubMed ID: 28092414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T.
Vos EK; Litjens GJ; Kobus T; Hambrock T; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO; Huisman HJ; Scheenen TW
Eur Urol; 2013 Sep; 64(3):448-55. PubMed ID: 23751135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy.
Schimmöller L; Quentin M; Arsov C; Hiester A; Buchbender C; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Blondin D
Eur Radiol; 2014 Oct; 24(10):2582-9. PubMed ID: 24972954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of double inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging (DIR-MRI) and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in detection of prostate cancer: A pilot study.
Onwuharine EN; Clark AJ
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Aug; 26(3):234-239. PubMed ID: 32052752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 4D perfusion CT of prostate cancer for image-guided radiotherapy planning: A proof of concept study.
Beer L; Polanec SH; Baltzer PAT; Schatzl G; Georg D; Schestak C; Dutschke A; Herrmann H; Mazal P; Brendel AK; Shariat SF; Ringl H; Helbich TH; Apfaltrer P
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225673. PubMed ID: 31856177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative analyses of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging on prostate cancer detection.
Ziayee F; Ullrich T; Blondin D; Irmer H; Arsov C; Antoch G; Quentin M; Schimmöller L
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249532. PubMed ID: 33819295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Lesion Visibility on Transrectal Ultrasound on the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 3 + 4 or Greater) with Transrectal Ultrasound-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsy.
Garcia-Reyes K; Nguyen HG; Zagoria RJ; Shinohara K; Carroll PR; Behr SC; Westphalen AC
J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):699-705. PubMed ID: 28941918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters with histological findings from MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Dianat SS; Carter HB; Schaeffer EM; Hamper UM; Epstein JI; Macura KJ
Can J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(5):7965-72. PubMed ID: 26432966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility.
van der Leest M; Israël B; Cornel EB; Zámecnik P; Schoots IG; van der Lelij H; Padhani AR; Rovers M; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Hannink G; Veltman J; Barentsz J
Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 31167748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging: the role of qualitative and quantitative parameters for evaluating prostate tumors stratified by Gleason score and PI-RADS v2.
Afshari Mirak S; Mohammadian Bajgiran A; Sung K; Asvadi NH; Markovic D; Felker ER; Lu D; Sisk A; Reiter RE; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jul; 45(7):2225-2234. PubMed ID: 31549211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic value of semi-quantitative and quantitative analysis of functional parameters in multiparametric MRI of the prostate.
Hauth E; Halbritter D; Jaeger H; Hohmuth H; Beer M
Br J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 90(1078):20170067. PubMed ID: 28749167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MR Imaging in Peripheral Lesions in PI-RADS-4 Patients.
Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Laqua N; Abrar D; Hiester A; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
Rofo; 2020 May; 192(5):441-447. PubMed ID: 31622990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound targeted biopsy versus standard systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer detection: results of a prospective cohort study with 1024 patients.
Yunkai Z; Yaqing C; Jun J; Tingyue Q; Weiyong L; Yuehong Q; Wenbin G; Lifeng W; Jun Q
World J Urol; 2019 May; 37(5):805-811. PubMed ID: 30187133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system for the detection of prostate cancer by the results of targeted biopsy of the prostate.
Baur AD; Maxeiner A; Franiel T; Kilic E; Huppertz A; Schwenke C; Hamm B; Durmus T
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 24598440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Classification in the Prediction of Tumor Aggressiveness in Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Renner T; Herout R; Baunacke M; Laniado M; Baretton GB; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth MP
Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):177-185. PubMed ID: 28531902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
