216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29239053)
1. Effect of Implant Connection Type and Depth on the Seating Accuracy of Hand-Tightened Abutments.
Siadat H; Belbasi S; Alikhasi M; Nazari V; Beyabanaki E
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e661-e665. PubMed ID: 29239053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A strain gauge analysis comparing external and internal implant-abutment connections.
Asvanund P
Implant Dent; 2014 Apr; 23(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 24614880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abutment rotational freedom on five implant systems with different internal connections.
Bédouin Y; Lefrançois E; Salomon JP; Auroy P
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):433-439. PubMed ID: 34238536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Different Abutments and Connections in Deformation Crestal Bone.
Mesquita AM; Silva JH; Saraceni CH; Kojima AN; Özcan M
Implant Dent; 2016 Jun; 25(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 27213528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microbiological assessment of the implant-abutment interface in different connections: cross-sectional study after 5 years of functional loading.
Canullo L; Penarrocha-Oltra D; Soldini C; Mazzocco F; Penarrocha M; Covani U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Apr; 26(4):426-434. PubMed ID: 24665919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.
Asvanund P; Morgano SM
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Oct; 106(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21962585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review.
Gracis S; Michalakis K; Vigolo P; Vult von Steyern P; Zwahlen M; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():202-16. PubMed ID: 23062143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics of implant-CAD/CAM abutment connections of two different internal connection systems.
Sumi T; Braian M; Shimada A; Shibata N; Takeshita K; Vandeweghe S; Coelho PG; Wennerberg A; Jimbo R
J Oral Rehabil; 2012 May; 39(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 22175784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Leutert CR; Sailer TR; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21443610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Coray R; Zeltner M; Özcan M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():333-346. PubMed ID: 27239815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Caricasulo R; Malchiodi L; Ghensi P; Fantozzi G; Cucchi A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):653-664. PubMed ID: 29761902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The abutment seating jig: a prosthodontic implant adjunct.
Judy KW
Implant Dent; 1997; 6(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 9206400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.
Siadat H; Beyabanaki E; Mousavi N; Alikhasi M
J Adv Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 9(4):271-277. PubMed ID: 28874994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wear at the Implant-Abutment Interface of Zirconia Abutments Manufactured by Three CAD/CAM Systems.
Pinheiro Tannure AL; Cunha AG; Borges Junior LA; da Silva Concílio LR; Claro Neves AC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):1241-1250. PubMed ID: 29140369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of abutment design on clinical status of peri-implant tissues.
Taiyeb-Ali TB; Toh CG; Siar CH; Seiz D; Ong ST
Implant Dent; 2009 Oct; 18(5):438-46. PubMed ID: 22129962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
