429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29239227)
1. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Defining the Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscope Reprocessing Using Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing.
Isaacson D; Ahmad T; Metzler I; Tzou DT; Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Zetumer S; Sherer B; Stoller M; Chi T
J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1026-1031. PubMed ID: 28830223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Economic Implications of a Reusable Flexible Digital Ureteroscope: A Cost-Benefit Analysis.
Martin CJ; McAdams SB; Abdul-Muhsin H; Lim VM; Nunez-Nateras R; Tyson MD; Humphreys MR
J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):730-735. PubMed ID: 27693449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.
Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes: How Do They Compare with Reusable Ureteroscopes?
Scotland KB; Chan JYH; Chew BH
J Endourol; 2019 Feb; 33(2):71-78. PubMed ID: 30612446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single use versus reusable digital flexible ureteroscopes: A prospective comparative study.
Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Beattie K; Ling KY; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Varol C; Khadra M; Winter M; Ko R
Int J Urol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):999-1005. PubMed ID: 31448473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Prospective Case-Control Study Comparing LithoVue, a Single-Use, Flexible Disposable Ureteroscope, with Flexible, Reusable Fiber-Optic Ureteroscopes.
Usawachintachit M; Isaacson DS; Taguchi K; Tzou DT; Hsi RS; Sherer BA; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 28287823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost Analysis of Flexible Ureteroscope Repairs: Evaluation of 655 Procedures in a Community-Based Practice.
Kramolowsky E; McDowell Z; Moore B; Booth B; Wood N
J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 26542761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The "Body Mass Index" of Flexible Ureteroscopes.
Proietti S; Somani B; Sofer M; Pietropaolo A; Rosso M; Saitta G; Gaboardi F; Traxer O; Giusti G
J Endourol; 2017 Oct; 31(10):1090-1095. PubMed ID: 28835120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcomes and costs of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes: a prospective cohort study.
Mager R; Kurosch M; Höfner T; Frees S; Haferkamp A; Neisius A
Urolithiasis; 2018 Nov; 46(6):587-593. PubMed ID: 29356873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective evaluation of flexible ureteroscopes with a novel evaluation tool.
Bell JR; Penniston KL; Best SL; Nakada SY
Can J Urol; 2017 Oct; 24(5):9004-9010. PubMed ID: 28971788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial Comment on: Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes by Taguchi et al.
Knudsen BE
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):274. PubMed ID: 29641355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Device profile of the LithoVue single-use digital flexible ureteroscope in the removal of kidney stones: overview of safety and efficacy.
Forbes CM; Lundeen C; Beebe S; Moore JP; Knudsen BE; Humphreys MR; Chew B
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2020 Dec; 17(12):1257-1264. PubMed ID: 33307869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope.
Dale J; Kaplan AG; Radvak D; Shin R; Ackerman A; Chen T; Scales CD; Ferrandino MN; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Lipkin ME
J Endourol; 2021 Jun; 35(6):903-907. PubMed ID: 27981862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impressive Performance: New Disposable Digital Ureteroscope Allows for Extreme Lower Pole Access and Use of 365 μm Holmium Laser Fiber.
Leveillee RJ; Kelly EF
J Endourol Case Rep; 2016; 2(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 27579436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current Disposable Ureteroscopes: Performance and Limitations in a Standardized Kidney Model.
Schlager D; Obaid MA; Hein S; Wilhelm K; Schönthaler M; Gratzke C; Miernik A; Schoeb DS
J Endourol; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1015-1020. PubMed ID: 32475165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes.
Al-Balushi K; Martin N; Loubon H; Baboudjian M; Michel F; Sichez PC; Martin T; Di-Crocco E; Gaillet S; Delaporte V; Akiki A; Faure A; Karsenty G; Lechevallier E; Boissier R
Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Oct; 51(10):1735-1741. PubMed ID: 31317310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.
Proietti S; Dragos L; Molina W; Doizi S; Giusti G; Traxer O
J Endourol; 2016 Jun; 30(6):655-9. PubMed ID: 27084572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
