These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29239662)

  • 1. The effect of electronic health records on patient safety: A qualitative exploratory study.
    Tubaishat A
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2019 Jan; 44(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 29239662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Barriers and facilitators to using electronic healthcare records in Jordanian hospitals from the nurses' perspective: A national survey.
    Al-Rawajfah O; Tubaishat A
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2019 Jan; 44(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 28829654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Privacy, confidentiality, security and patient safety concerns about electronic health records.
    Bani Issa W; Al Akour I; Ibrahim A; Almarzouqi A; Abbas S; Hisham F; Griffiths J
    Int Nurs Rev; 2020 Jun; 67(2):218-230. PubMed ID: 32314398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of electronic health records among nurses: Application of Technology Acceptance Model.
    Tubaishat A
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2018 Dec; 43(4):379-389. PubMed ID: 28920708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurses' perceptions of an electronic patient record from a patient safety perspective: a qualitative study.
    Stevenson JE; Nilsson G
    J Adv Nurs; 2012 Mar; 68(3):667-76. PubMed ID: 21781148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive workload changes for nurses transitioning from a legacy system with paper documentation to a commercial electronic health record.
    Colligan L; Potts HW; Finn CT; Sinkin RA
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Jul; 84(7):469-76. PubMed ID: 25868807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses' perceptions, attitudes, and preferences.
    Moody LE; Slocumb E; Berg B; Jackson D
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2004; 22(6):337-44. PubMed ID: 15602303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Barriers and facilitators to electronic documentation in a rural hospital.
    Whittaker AA; Aufdenkamp M; Tinley S
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2009; 41(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 19723278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature.
    Häyrinen K; Saranto K; Nykänen P
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 May; 77(5):291-304. PubMed ID: 17951106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oncologists' Views Regarding the Role of Electronic Health Records in Care Coordination.
    Asan O; Nattinger AB; Gurses AP; Tyszka JT; Yen TWF
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2018 Dec; 2():1-12. PubMed ID: 30652555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation.
    Morrison Z; Fernando B; Kalra D; Cresswell K; Sheikh A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014; 21(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 24186957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
    Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unintended adverse consequences of introducing electronic health records in residential aged care homes.
    Yu P; Zhang Y; Gong Y; Zhang J
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Sep; 82(9):772-88. PubMed ID: 23770027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Problems Faced by Nurses in Use of Electronic Health Records During Clinical Practice.
    Verma M; Gupta S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():985-6. PubMed ID: 27332444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting physicians' use of a dedicated overview interface in an electronic health record: The importance of standard information and standard documentation.
    Jensen LG; Bossen C
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():44-53. PubMed ID: 26806711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anything but engaged: user involvement in the context of a national electronic health record implementation.
    Cresswell K; Morrison Z; Crowe S; Robertson A; Sheikh A
    Inform Prim Care; 2011; 19(4):191-206. PubMed ID: 22828574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physician experiences transitioning between an older versus newer electronic health record for electronic prescribing.
    Abramson EL; Patel V; Malhotra S; Pfoh ER; Nena Osorio S; Cheriff A; Cole CL; Bunce A; Ash J; Kaushal R
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Aug; 81(8):539-48. PubMed ID: 22465355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strengths and limitations of the electronic health record for documenting clinical events.
    Carrington JM; Effken JA
    Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Jun; 29(6):360-7. PubMed ID: 21107239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of hospital electronic health record adoption on nurse-assessed quality of care and patient safety.
    Kutney-Lee A; Kelly D
    J Nurs Adm; 2011 Nov; 41(11):466-72. PubMed ID: 22033316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Staff expectations for the implementation of an electronic health record system: a qualitative study using normalisation process theory.
    McCrorie C; Benn J; Johnson OA; Scantlebury A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Nov; 19(1):222. PubMed ID: 31727063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.