599 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29239858)
21. Breast density prediction from low and standard dose mammograms using deep learning: effect of image resolution and model training approach on prediction quality.
Squires S; Harkness EF; Mackenzie A; Evans DG; Howell SJ; Astley SM
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 May; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 38701765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Detection of mass regions in mammograms by bilateral analysis adapted to breast density using similarity indexes and convolutional neural networks.
Bandeira Diniz JO; Bandeira Diniz PH; Azevedo Valente TL; Corrêa Silva A; de Paiva AC; Gattass M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():191-207. PubMed ID: 29428071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Large scale deep learning for computer aided detection of mammographic lesions.
Kooi T; Litjens G; van Ginneken B; Gubern-Mérida A; Sánchez CI; Mann R; den Heeten A; Karssemeijer N
Med Image Anal; 2017 Jan; 35():303-312. PubMed ID: 27497072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Classification of Breast Masses Using a Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammograms.
Danala G; Patel B; Aghaei F; Heidari M; Li J; Wu T; Zheng B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1419-1431. PubMed ID: 29748869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative analysis of breast cancer detection in mammograms and thermograms.
Milosevic M; Jankovic D; Peulic A
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Feb; 60(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 25720034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Breast mass detection and diagnosis using fused features with density.
Wang Z; Huang Y; Li M; Zhang H; Li C; Xin J; Qian W
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(2):321-342. PubMed ID: 30856154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.
Keller BM; Nathan DL; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee JC; Conant EF; Kontos D
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4903-17. PubMed ID: 22894417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predicting Breast Cancer by Applying Deep Learning to Linked Health Records and Mammograms.
Akselrod-Ballin A; Chorev M; Shoshan Y; Spiro A; Hazan A; Melamed R; Barkan E; Herzel E; Naor S; Karavani E; Koren G; Goldschmidt Y; Shalev V; Rosen-Zvi M; Guindy M
Radiology; 2019 Aug; 292(2):331-342. PubMed ID: 31210611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computer-aided classification of mammographic masses using visually sensitive image features.
Wang Y; Aghaei F; Zarafshani A; Qiu Y; Qian W; Zheng B
J Xray Sci Technol; 2017; 25(1):171-186. PubMed ID: 27911353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improving the Mann-Whitney statistical test for feature selection: an approach in breast cancer diagnosis on mammography.
Pérez NP; Guevara López MA; Silva A; Ramos I
Artif Intell Med; 2015 Jan; 63(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 25555756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A novel method of determining breast cancer risk using parenchymal textural analysis of mammography images on an Asian cohort.
Tan M; Mariapun S; Yip CH; Ng KH; Teo SH
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(3):035016. PubMed ID: 30577031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computer-aided diagnosis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A feasibility study.
Patel BK; Ranjbar S; Wu T; Pockaj BA; Li J; Zhang N; Lobbes M; Zhang B; Mitchell JR
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():207-213. PubMed ID: 29279165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Applying a new quantitative global breast MRI feature analysis scheme to assess tumor response to chemotherapy.
Aghaei F; Tan M; Hollingsworth AB; Zheng B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1099-1106. PubMed ID: 27080203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improving Performance of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction by Incorporating Optical Density Image Feature Analysis: An Assessment.
Yan S; Wang Y; Aghaei F; Qiu Y; Zheng B
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S199-S210. PubMed ID: 28985925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.
Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Strand F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30697755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computerized prediction of risk for developing breast cancer based on bilateral mammographic breast tissue asymmetry.
Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Wang XH; Zheng B
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):934-42. PubMed ID: 21482168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Deep Learning Mammography-based Model for Improved Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Yala A; Lehman C; Schuster T; Portnoi T; Barzilay R
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 31063083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A multi-stage fusion framework to classify breast lesions using deep learning and radiomics features computed from four-view mammograms.
Jones MA; Sadeghipour N; Chen X; Islam W; Zheng B
Med Phys; 2023 Dec; 50(12):7670-7683. PubMed ID: 37083190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of a Deep Learning Risk Score and Standard Mammographic Density Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
Dembrower K; Liu Y; Azizpour H; Eklund M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Strand F
Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 31845842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
