BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29239965)

  • 1. Videolaryngoscopy for Physician-Based, Prehospital Emergency Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Comparison of Different Blade Types Using A.P. Advance, C-MAC System, and KingVision.
    Cavus E; Janssen S; Reifferscheid F; Caliebe A; Callies A; von der Heyden M; Knacke PG; Doerges V
    Anesth Analg; 2018 May; 126(5):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 29239965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomised clinical trial comparing the 'sniffing' and neutral position using channelled (KingVision
    Mendonca C; Ungureanu N; Nowicka A; Kumar P
    Anaesthesia; 2018 Jul; 73(7):847-855. PubMed ID: 29660807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of three unchannelled videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway: a randomised, controlled trial.
    Kleine-Brueggeney M; Buttenberg M; Greif R; Nabecker S; Theiler L
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Mar; 72(3):370-378. PubMed ID: 27882535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.
    Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the McGrath Mac Video Laryngoscope and Direct Laryngoscopy for Prehospital Emergency Intubation in Air Rescue Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
    Kreutziger J; Hornung S; Harrer C; Urschl W; Doppler R; Voelckel WG; Trimmel H
    Crit Care Med; 2019 Oct; 47(10):1362-1370. PubMed ID: 31389835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways.
    Serocki G; Neumann T; Scharf E; Dörges V; Cavus E
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2013 Feb; 79(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 23032922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The C-MAC videolaryngoscope for prehospital emergency intubation: a prospective, multicentre, observational study.
    Cavus E; Callies A; Doerges V; Heller G; Merz S; Rösch P; Steinfath M; Helm M
    Emerg Med J; 2011 Aug; 28(8):650-3. PubMed ID: 21422034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the C-MAC D-Blade Versus the GlideScope in a Mixed Provider and Diverse Patient Population.
    Aziz MF; Abrons RO; Cattano D; Bayman EO; Swanson DE; Hagberg CA; Todd MM; Brambrink AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Mar; 122(3):740-750. PubMed ID: 26579847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the emergency department: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Choi HJ; Kim YM; Oh YM; Kang HG; Yim HW; Jeong SH;
    BMJ Open; 2015 May; 5(5):e007884. PubMed ID: 25968006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.
    Aziz MF; Dillman D; Fu R; Brambrink AM
    Anesthesiology; 2012 Mar; 116(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 22261795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Macintosh Videolaryngoscope for Intubation in the Operating Room: A Comparative Quality Improvement Project.
    De Jong A; Pouzeratte Y; Laplace A; Normanno M; Rollé A; Verzilli D; Perrigault PF; Colson P; Capdevila X; Molinari N; Jaber S
    Anesth Analg; 2021 Feb; 132(2):524-535. PubMed ID: 32739955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer].
    Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR
    Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the GlideScope Ranger Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation in the Prehospital Setting: A Randomized Control Trial.
    Trimmel H; Kreutziger J; Fitzka R; Szüts S; Derdak C; Koch E; Erwied B; Voelckel WG
    Crit Care Med; 2016 Jul; 44(7):e470-6. PubMed ID: 27002277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. First pass success of tracheal intubation using the C-MAC PM videolaryngoscope as first-line device in prehospital cardiac arrest compared with other emergencies: An observational study.
    Hossfeld B; Thierbach S; Allgoewer A; Gaessler H; Helm M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2021 Aug; 38(8):806-812. PubMed ID: 32833853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial.
    Sulser S; Ubmann D; Schlaepfer M; Brueesch M; Goliasch G; Seifert B; Spahn DR; Ruetzler K
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Dec; 33(12):943-948. PubMed ID: 27533711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study.
    Madziala M; Smereka J; Dabrowski M; Leung S; Ruetzler K; Szarpak L
    Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28429117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of success rates between two video laryngoscope systems used in a prehospital clinical trial.
    Burnett AM; Frascone RJ; Wewerka SS; Kealey SE; Evens ZN; Griffith KR; Salzman JG
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 24400965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope with the King Vision video laryngoscope in adult patients.
    Alvis BD; Hester D; Watson D; Higgins M; St Jacques P
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2016 Jan; 82(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 25881731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.
    Kleine-Brueggeney M; Greif R; Schoettker P; Savoldelli GL; Nabecker S; Theiler LG
    Br J Anaesth; 2016 May; 116(5):670-9. PubMed ID: 27106971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department.
    Sakles JC; Mosier J; Chiu S; Cosentino M; Kalin L
    Ann Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 60(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 22560464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.