These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29241426)

  • 1. Causal inference with measurement error in outcomes: Bias analysis and estimation methods.
    Shu D; Yi GY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jul; 28(7):2049-2068. PubMed ID: 29241426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causal inference with noisy data: Bias analysis and estimation approaches to simultaneously addressing missingness and misclassification in binary outcomes.
    Shu D; Yi GY
    Stat Med; 2020 Feb; 39(4):456-468. PubMed ID: 31802532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
    Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
    Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Weighted causal inference methods with mismeasured covariates and misclassified outcomes.
    Shu D; Yi GY
    Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(10):1835-1854. PubMed ID: 30609095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of the average treatment effect with variable selection and measurement error simultaneously addressed for potential confounders.
    Yi GY; Chen LP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Apr; 32(4):691-711. PubMed ID: 36694932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
    Waernbaum I
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consistent inverse probability of treatment weighted estimation of the average treatment effect with mismeasured time-dependent confounders.
    Yan Y; Ren M
    Stat Med; 2023 Feb; 42(4):517-535. PubMed ID: 36513267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A weighting method for simultaneous adjustment for confounding and joint exposure-outcome misclassifications.
    Penning de Vries BB; van Smeden M; Groenwold RH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Feb; 30(2):473-487. PubMed ID: 32998668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical methods for incomplete data: Some results on model misspecification.
    McIsaac M; Cook RJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):248-267. PubMed ID: 25063681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of outcome model misspecification on regression and doubly-robust inverse probability weighting to estimate causal effect.
    Lefebvre G; Gustafson P
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 15. PubMed ID: 21969999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects.
    Xie Y; Cotton C; Zhu Y
    Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4238-4251. PubMed ID: 32857876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inverse probability weighting with error-prone covariates.
    McCaffrey DF; Lockwood JR; Setodji CM
    Biometrika; 2013; 100(3):671-680. PubMed ID: 24795484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating population treatment effects from a survey subsample.
    Rudolph KE; Díaz I; Rosenblum M; Stuart EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 180(7):737-48. PubMed ID: 25190679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inverse-probability-of-treatment weighted estimation of causal parameters in the presence of error-contaminated and time-dependent confounders.
    Shu D; Yi GY
    Biom J; 2019 Nov; 61(6):1507-1525. PubMed ID: 31449324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data-Adaptive Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation.
    Vermeulen K; Vansteelandt S
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):253-82. PubMed ID: 27227724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
    Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Best linear inverse probability weighted estimation for two-phase designs and missing covariate regression.
    Wang CY; Dai J
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(15):2783-2796. PubMed ID: 30908669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. G-computation and doubly robust standardisation for continuous-time data: A comparison with inverse probability weighting.
    Chatton A; Borgne FL; Leyrat C; Foucher Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Apr; 31(4):706-718. PubMed ID: 34861799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adjustment for Baseline Covariates to Increase Efficiency in RCTs with Binary Endpoint: A Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches.
    Berchialla P; Sciannameo V; Urru S; Lanera C; Azzolina D; Gregori D; Baldi I
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(15):. PubMed ID: 34360051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doubly robust inference for targeted minimum loss-based estimation in randomized trials with missing outcome data.
    Díaz I; van der Laan MJ
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3807-3819. PubMed ID: 28744883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.