These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 292418)
1. An endocervical speculum. Chanen W Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 Feb; 19(1):40-1. PubMed ID: 292418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colposcopy, cervicography, speculoscopy and endoscopy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial. van Niekerk WA; Dunton CJ; Richart RM; Hilgarth M; Kato H; Kaufman RH; Mango LJ; Nozawa S; Robinowitz M Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 9479322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush. Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The utility of endocervical curettage: does routine ECC at the time of colposcopy for low-grade cytologic abnormalities improve diagnosis of high-grade disease? Rose JD; Byun SY; Sims SM; Davis JD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):530.e1-3. PubMed ID: 22541611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cone biopsy: has endocervical sampling a role? Anderson DJ; Strachan F; Parkin DE Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Aug; 99(8):668-70. PubMed ID: 1390473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia. Ullal A; Roberts M; Bulmer JN; Mathers ME; Wadehra V Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 18557985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence and evaluation of an AGUS Papanicolaou smear in primary care. Valdini A; Vaccaro C; Pechinsky G; Abernathy V J Am Board Fam Pract; 2001; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 11355048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contribution of endocervical curettage in evaluating abnormal cervical cytology. Drescher CW; Peters WA; Roberts JA Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 6877690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. RO-TAGE biopsy. An improved method of endocervical evaluation. Mann WJ; Chumas J; Rochelson B; Funt M; Westermann C J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):376-8. PubMed ID: 4009558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy. Hatch KD; Shingleton HM; Orr JW; Gore H; Soong SJ Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trial of new cervical spatula. Bourne R; Beilby JO Lancet; 1976 Jun; 1(7973):1330-1. PubMed ID: 58317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Evaluation by colposcopy, biopsies, and endocervical curettage. Townsend DE; Ostergard DR; Mishell DR; Hirose FM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Oct; 108(3):429-34. PubMed ID: 5484600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical conization findings in women with dysplastic cervical cytology and normal colposcopy. Ramirez EJ; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K J Reprod Med; 1990 Apr; 35(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 2352226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of the endocervical brush after endocervical curettage. Tate KM; Strickland JL Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):715-7. PubMed ID: 9351750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Paired Papanicolaou smears in the evaluation of atypical squamous cells. Andrews S; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 73(5 Pt 1):747-50. PubMed ID: 2704501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of endocervical canal topography, tubal metaplasia, and high canal sampling on the cytologic presentation of nonneoplastic endocervical cells. Babkowski RC; Wilbur DC; Rutkowski MA; Facik MS; Bonfiglio TA Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Apr; 105(4):403-10. PubMed ID: 8604682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outpatient evaluation of patients with atypical Papanicolaou smears: contribution of endocervical curettage. Shingleton HM; Gore H; Austin JM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Sep; 126(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 961737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears. Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage? Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]