These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29242392)

  • 21. Modified Bundle of Capillaries Approximation of Sterilizing Filter Membranes and its use for Filter Characterization and Filtration Process Optimization.
    Zakrewsky M; Hoopes P
    J Pharm Sci; 2022 Feb; 111(2):382-394. PubMed ID: 34600942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative Extractables Study of Autoclavable Polyethersulfone Filter Cartridges for Sterile Filtration.
    Menzel R; Pahl I; Loewe T; Hauk A
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2018; 72(3):298-316. PubMed ID: 29343620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scalability of Sterilizing-Grade Filters in Different Filtration Modes.
    Jannik D; Sebastian H; BjÖrn H; Thomas L
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(6):644-659. PubMed ID: 32675307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scaling from discs to pleated devices.
    Giglia S; Yavorsky D
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2007; 61(4):314-23. PubMed ID: 17933212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preuse/Poststerilization Integrity Testing (PUPSIT): To Do or Not to Do?
    Gupta VS; Jindal J; Gupta A; Gupta NK
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(3):301-308. PubMed ID: 31732690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Liposome Formulations of Hydrophobic Drugs.
    Schwendener RA; Schott H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1522():73-82. PubMed ID: 27837531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Peritoneal retention of liposomes: Effects of lipid composition, PEG coating and liposome charge.
    Dadashzadeh S; Mirahmadi N; Babaei MH; Vali AM
    J Control Release; 2010 Dec; 148(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 20800629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Risk-based Approach to Setting Sterile Filtration Bioburden Limits.
    Yang H; Li N; Chang S
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2013; 67(6):601-9. PubMed ID: 24265301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the bubble point test of a 0.22-μm membrane filter used for the sterilizing filtration of PET radiopharmaceuticals.
    Hayashi K; Douhara K; Kashino G
    Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Jul; 28(6):586-92. PubMed ID: 24610680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Development of a Microbial Challenge Test with Acholeplasma laidlawii To Rate Mycoplasma-Retentive Filters by Filter Manufacturers.
    Folmsbee M; Lentine KR; Wright C; Haake G; Mcburnie L; Ashtekar D; Beck B; Hutchison N; Okhio-Seaman L; Potts B; Pawar V; Windsor H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2014; 68(3):281-96. PubMed ID: 25188349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Practical methods for the microbial validation of sterilizing-grade filters used in aseptic processing.
    MacDonald WD; Pelletier CA; Gasper DL
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1989; 43(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 2689620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of pressure-hold test for sterilizing filter membrane integrity in radiopharmaceutical manufacturing.
    Belanger AP; Byrne JF; Paolino JM; DeGrado TR
    Nucl Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 36(8):955-9. PubMed ID: 19875052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part III: Bacterial challenge tests on 0.1 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 11310317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selective isolation of bacteria for metagenomic analysis: Impact of membrane characteristics on bacterial filterability.
    Nnadozie CF; Lin J; Govinden R
    Biotechnol Prog; 2015; 31(4):853-66. PubMed ID: 26018114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retention of
    Helling A; König H; Seiler F; Berkholz R; Thom V; Polakovic M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2018; 72(3):264-277. PubMed ID: 29343618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part I: characterization of water isolates for potential use as standard challenge organisms to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):346-72. PubMed ID: 11766822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of extractables/leachables from filters on stability of protein formulations.
    Huang M; Horwitz TS; Zweiben C; Singh SK
    J Pharm Sci; 2011 Nov; 100(11):4617-30. PubMed ID: 21695696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Development of formulation of hipromellose eye drops (artificial tears)].
    Inkeniene AM; Klimas R; Briedis V; Maciulevicius J
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2003; 39(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 12576769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part I: Bacterial challenge tests on 0.2 and 0.22 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(2):65-86. PubMed ID: 11310322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Limited retention of micro-organisms using commercialized needle filters.
    Elbaz W; McCarthy G; Mawhinney T; Goldsmith CE; Moore JE
    J Hosp Infect; 2015 Mar; 89(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 25618235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.