BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

864 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29242990)

  • 1. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
    Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of insertion quality of a slim perimodiolar electrode array.
    Beck R; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Rauch AK; Ketterer MC
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Mar; 281(3):1215-1220. PubMed ID: 37773530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays.
    Boyer E; Karkas A; Attye A; Lefournier V; Escude B; Schmerber S
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 25575374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiological evaluation of a new straight electrode array compared to its precursors.
    Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Speck I; Rauch AK; Beck R; Hassepass F
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 278(10):3707-3714. PubMed ID: 33090276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a new mid-scala cochlear implant electrode using microcomputed tomography.
    Frisch CD; Carlson ML; Lane JI; Driscoll CL
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Dec; 125(12):2778-83. PubMed ID: 25946683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Radeloff A; Mack M; Baghi M; Gstoettner WK; Adunka OF
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18090204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of electrode position between round window and cochleostomy inserting approaches among young children: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Fan X; Xia M; Wang Z; Zhang H; Liu C; Wang N; Hou L; Li C; Xu A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Sep; 138(9):815-821. PubMed ID: 29936898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrode array design determines scalar position, dislocation rate and angle and postoperative speech perception.
    Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Beck R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Sep; 279(9):4257-4267. PubMed ID: 34778920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of Insertion Models Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Position.
    van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Wolterbeek R; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):473-82. PubMed ID: 26760199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relations Between Scalar Shift and Insertion Depth in Human Cochlear Implantation.
    Zelener F; Majdani O; Roemer A; Lexow GJ; Giesemann A; Lenarz T; Warnecke A
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Feb; 41(2):178-185. PubMed ID: 31789806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the Position of the Basal-Most Electrode Depending on Electrode Array Design and Influencing Postoperative Speech Perception? A Retrospective Analysis of 495 Ears.
    Beck RL; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hildenbrand T; Ketterer MC
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Jun; 45(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 38509805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Intracochlear electrode position: evaluation after deep insertion using cone beam computed tomography].
    Güldner C; Weiss R; Eivazi B; Bien S; Werner JA; Diogo I
    HNO; 2012 Sep; 60(9):817-22. PubMed ID: 22767189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes.
    Wanna GB; Noble JH; Carlson ML; Gifford RH; Dietrich MS; Haynes DS; Dawant BM; Labadie RF
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124 Suppl 6(0 6):S1-7. PubMed ID: 24764083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imaging cochlear implantation with round window insertion in human temporal bones and cochlear morphological variation using high-resolution cone beam CT.
    Zou J; Lähelmä J; Koivisto J; Dhanasingh A; Jolly C; Aarnisalo A; Wolff J; Pyykkö I
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015 May; 135(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 25675836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Atraumatic Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Pre-Curved Electrode Array by a Robot-Automated Alignment with the Coiling Direction of the Scala Tympani.
    Torres R; Hochet B; Daoudi H; Carré F; Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Ferrary E; Nguyen Y
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 34284383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical investigation of the Nucleus Slim Modiolar Electrode.
    Aschendorff A; Briggs R; Brademann G; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(3):169-179. PubMed ID: 29059669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Round Window vs Cochleostomy Surgical Approaches on Cochlear Implant Electrode Position: A Flat-Panel Computed Tomography Study.
    Jiam NT; Jiradejvong P; Pearl MS; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 142(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 27355198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging of the human cochlea using micro-computed tomography before and after cochlear implantation: comparison with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Karkas A; Boureille P; Laroche N; Vico L; Bergandi F; Marotte H
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jul; 280(7):3131-3140. PubMed ID: 36604323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The new mid-scala electrode array: a radiologic and histologic study in human temporal bones.
    Hassepass F; Bulla S; Maier W; Laszig R; Arndt S; Beck R; Traser L; Aschendorff A
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1415-20. PubMed ID: 24836594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Relationship between the NRT-Ratio, Cochlear Anatomy, and Insertions Depth of Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes.
    Mittmann P; Rademacher G; Mutze S; Hassepass F; Ernst A; Todt I
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():706253. PubMed ID: 26839885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.