These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29243202)
41. Recovery of upper-limb function due to enhanced use-dependent plasticity in chronic stroke patients. Koganemaru S; Mima T; Thabit MN; Ikkaku T; Shimada K; Kanematsu M; Takahashi K; Fawi G; Takahashi R; Fukuyama H; Domen K Brain; 2010 Nov; 133(11):3373-84. PubMed ID: 20688810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Models to Tailor Brain Stimulation Therapies in Stroke. Plow EB; Sankarasubramanian V; Cunningham DA; Potter-Baker K; Varnerin N; Cohen LG; Sterr A; Conforto AB; Machado AG Neural Plast; 2016; 2016():4071620. PubMed ID: 27006833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. What Do We Know About the Influence of the Cerebellum on Walking Ability? Promising Findings from Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation. Naro A; Milardi D; Cacciola A; Russo M; Sciarrone F; La Rosa G; Bramanti A; Bramanti P; Calabrò RS Cerebellum; 2017 Aug; 16(4):859-867. PubMed ID: 28456901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Long term clinical and neurophysiological effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia. Benussi A; Dell'Era V; Cotelli MS; Turla M; Casali C; Padovani A; Borroni B Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(2):242-250. PubMed ID: 27838276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The Effect of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Poststroke Cognitive Function: A Systematic Review. van Lieshout ECC; van Hooijdonk RF; Dijkhuizen RM; Visser-Meily JMA; Nijboer TCW Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2019 May; 33(5):355-374. PubMed ID: 31021702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Tailoring Brain Stimulation to the Nature of Rehabilitative Therapies in Stroke: A Conceptual Framework Based on their Unique Mechanisms of Recovery. Cunningham DA; Potter-Baker KA; Knutson JS; Sankarasubramanian V; Machado AG; Plow EB Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2015 Nov; 26(4):759-74. PubMed ID: 26522911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation of the Cerebellum in Emotion. Klaus J; Schutter DJLG Adv Exp Med Biol; 2022; 1378():109-121. PubMed ID: 35902468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Non-invasive brain stimulation in early rehabilitation after stroke. Blesneag AV; Popa L; Stan AD J Med Life; 2015; 8 Spec Issue(Spec Issue):52-6. PubMed ID: 26361512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Transcranial Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Verb Generation but Not Verb Naming in Poststroke Aphasia. Marangolo P; Fiori V; Caltagirone C; Pisano F; Priori A J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 30(2):188-199. PubMed ID: 29064340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Improving motor recovery after cortical stroke using cerebellar non-invasive transcranial stimulation. Cecatto RB; Battistella LR Minerva Med; 2021 Jun; 112(3):409-411. PubMed ID: 31638355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Can neuromodulation techniques optimally exploit cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit properties to enhance motor learning post-stroke? Israely S; Leisman G Rev Neurosci; 2019 Nov; 30(8):821-837. PubMed ID: 31194694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Dual-mode noninvasive brain stimulation over the bilateral primary motor cortices in stroke patients. Cho JY; Lee A; Kim MS; Park E; Chang WH; Shin YI; Kim YH Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2017; 35(1):105-114. PubMed ID: 28157112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Adaptive Plasticity in the Healthy Language Network: Implications for Language Recovery after Stroke. Hartwigsen G Neural Plast; 2016; 2016():9674790. PubMed ID: 27830094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. New Horizons on Non-invasive Brain Stimulation of the Social and Affective Cerebellum. Cattaneo Z; Ferrari C; Ciricugno A; Heleven E; Schutter DJLG; Manto M; Van Overwalle F Cerebellum; 2022 Jun; 21(3):482-496. PubMed ID: 34270081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Can cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation become a valuable neurorehabilitation intervention? Block HJ; Celnik P Expert Rev Neurother; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1275-7. PubMed ID: 23234389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. [The effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on neuroplasticity in the early recovery period after ischemic stroke]. Tereshin AE; Kiryanova VV; Reshetnik DA; Karyagina MV; Konstantinov KV; Lapin SV; Moshnikova AN Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult; 2022; 99(5):5-12. PubMed ID: 36279371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the non-lesioned hemisphere improves paretic arm reach-to-grasp performance after chronic stroke. Tretriluxana J; Kantak S; Tretriluxana S; Wu AD; Fisher BE Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Mar; 8(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 23244391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS): A Novel Approach to Understanding Cerebellar Function in Health and Disease. Grimaldi G; Argyropoulos GP; Bastian A; Cortes M; Davis NJ; Edwards DJ; Ferrucci R; Fregni F; Galea JM; Hamada M; Manto M; Miall RC; Morales-Quezada L; Pope PA; Priori A; Rothwell J; Tomlinson SP; Celnik P Neuroscientist; 2016 Feb; 22(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 25406224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity. Bolognini N; Pascual-Leone A; Fregni F J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2009 Mar; 6():8. PubMed ID: 19292910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Time configuration of combined neuromodulation and motor training after stroke: A proof-of-concept study. Powell ES; Carrico C; Westgate PM; Chelette KC; Nichols L; Reddy L; Salyers E; Ward A; Sawaki L NeuroRehabilitation; 2016 Jul; 39(3):439-49. PubMed ID: 27589514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]