383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29243996)
1. Validation of the visual analog scale in the cervical spine.
MacDowall A; Skeppholm M; Robinson Y; Olerud C
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):227-235. PubMed ID: 29243996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of preoperative mental distress versus surgical modality, arthroplasty, or fusion on long-term outcome in patients with cervical radiculopathy.
MacDowall A; Skeppholm M; Lindhagen L; Robinson Y; Olerud C
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Oct; 29(4):371-379. PubMed ID: 30004317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anxiety and depression affect pain drawings in cervical degenerative disc disease.
MacDowall A; Robinson Y; Skeppholm M; Olerud C
Ups J Med Sci; 2017 Jun; 122(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 28503982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease with radiculopathy: 5-year outcomes from the National Swedish Spine Register.
MacDowall A; Skeppholm M; Lindhagen L; Robinson Y; Löfgren H; Michaëlsson K; Olerud C
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):159-167. PubMed ID: 30485205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical outcomes of cervical disc herniation treated by posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy].
Chen BL; Li YJ; Lin YP; Du YX; Zhao S; Su GY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 55(12):923-927. PubMed ID: 29224267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Anderson PA
Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative mental health status may not be predictive of improvements in patient-reported outcomes following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Mayo BC; Massel DH; Bohl DD; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Long WW; Modi KD; Basques BA; Yacob A; Singh K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):177-182. PubMed ID: 27689424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial disc replacement versus fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial with 5-year outcomes.
MacDowall A; Canto Moreira N; Marques C; Skeppholm M; Lindhagen L; Robinson Y; Löfgren H; Michaëlsson K; Olerud C
J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Jan; 30(3):323-331. PubMed ID: 30641852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years' follow-up.
Fay LY; Huang WC; Wu JC; Chang HK; Tsai TY; Ko CC; Tu TH; Wu CL; Cheng H
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):400-10. PubMed ID: 24926929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk factors for failure to achieve minimal clinically important difference following cervical disc replacement.
Mai E; Shahi P; Lee R; Shinn DJ; Vaishnav A; Araghi K; Singh N; Maayan O; Tuma OC; Pajak A; Asada T; Korsun MK; Singh S; Kim YE; Louie PK; Huang RC; Albert TJ; Dowdell J; Sheha ED; Iyer S; Qureshi SA
Spine J; 2023 Dec; 23(12):1808-1816. PubMed ID: 37660897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring surgical outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: assessment of minimum clinically important difference.
Auffinger BM; Lall RR; Dahdaleh NS; Wong AP; Lam SK; Koski T; Fessler RG; Smith ZA
PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e67408. PubMed ID: 23826290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.
Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Timed Up and Go Test After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.
Gautschi OP; Stienen MN; Corniola MV; Joswig H; Schaller K; Hildebrandt G; Smoll NR
Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):380-385. PubMed ID: 27352275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usefulness of minimum clinically important difference for assessing patients with subaxial degenerative cervical spine disease: statistical versus substantial clinical benefit.
Auffinger B; Lam S; Shen J; Thaci B; Roitberg BZ
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 Dec; 155(12):2345-54; discussion 2355. PubMed ID: 24136679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
