BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29244014)

  • 1. CAMSA: a tool for comparative analysis and merging of scaffold assemblies.
    Aganezov SS; Alekseyev MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 15):496. PubMed ID: 29244014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative evaluation of genome assembly reconciliation tools.
    Alhakami H; Mirebrahim H; Lonardi S
    Genome Biol; 2017 May; 18(1):93. PubMed ID: 28521789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assembly reconciliation.
    Zimin AV; Smith DR; Sutton G; Yorke JA
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 18057021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of three assembly strategies for a heterozygous seedless grapevine genome assembly.
    Patel S; Lu Z; Jin X; Swaminathan P; Zeng E; Fennell AY
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 29343235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CAR: contig assembly of prokaryotic draft genomes using rearrangements.
    Lu CL; Chen KT; Huang SY; Chiu HT
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):381. PubMed ID: 25431302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. dnAQET: a framework to compute a consolidated metric for benchmarking quality of de novo assemblies.
    Yavas G; Hong H; Xiao W
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Sep; 20(1):706. PubMed ID: 31510940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GenomeQC: a quality assessment tool for genome assemblies and gene structure annotations.
    Manchanda N; Portwood JL; Woodhouse MR; Seetharam AS; Lawrence-Dill CJ; Andorf CM; Hufford MB
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):193. PubMed ID: 32122303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positional bias in variant calls against draft reference assemblies.
    Briskine RV; Shimizu KK
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):263. PubMed ID: 28351369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SIMBA: a web tool for managing bacterial genome assembly generated by Ion PGM sequencing technology.
    Mariano DC; Pereira FL; Aguiar EL; Oliveira LC; Benevides L; Guimarães LC; Folador EL; Sousa TJ; Ghosh P; Barh D; Figueiredo HC; Silva A; Ramos RT; Azevedo VA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 18):456. PubMed ID: 28105921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inferring synteny between genome assemblies: a systematic evaluation.
    Liu D; Hunt M; Tsai IJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):26. PubMed ID: 29382321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. GAM-NGS: genomic assemblies merger for next generation sequencing.
    Vicedomini R; Vezzi F; Scalabrin S; Arvestad L; Policriti A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):S6. PubMed ID: 23815503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SIS: a program to generate draft genome sequence scaffolds for prokaryotes.
    Dias Z; Dias U; Setubal JC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 May; 13():96. PubMed ID: 22583530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multi-CAR: a tool of contig scaffolding using multiple references.
    Chen KT; Chen CJ; Shen HT; Liu CL; Huang SH; Lu CL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 17):469. PubMed ID: 28155633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evolutionary superscaffolding and chromosome anchoring to improve Anopheles genome assemblies.
    Waterhouse RM; Aganezov S; Anselmetti Y; Lee J; Ruzzante L; Reijnders MJMF; Feron R; Bérard S; George P; Hahn MW; Howell PI; Kamali M; Koren S; Lawson D; Maslen G; Peery A; Phillippy AM; Sharakhova MV; Tannier E; Unger MF; Zhang SV; Alekseyev MA; Besansky NJ; Chauve C; Emrich SJ; Sharakhov IV
    BMC Biol; 2020 Jan; 18(1):1. PubMed ID: 31898513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies.
    Gurevich A; Saveliev V; Vyahhi N; Tesler G
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Apr; 29(8):1072-5. PubMed ID: 23422339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads.
    Wick RR; Judd LM; Gorrie CL; Holt KE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jun; 13(6):e1005595. PubMed ID: 28594827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chromosomer: a reference-based genome arrangement tool for producing draft chromosome sequences.
    Tamazian G; Dobrynin P; Krasheninnikova K; Komissarov A; Koepfli KP; O'Brien SJ
    Gigascience; 2016 Aug; 5(1):38. PubMed ID: 27549770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extensive error in the number of genes inferred from draft genome assemblies.
    Denton JF; Lugo-Martinez J; Tucker AE; Schrider DR; Warren WC; Hahn MW
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 Dec; 10(12):e1003998. PubMed ID: 25474019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GARM: genome assembly, reconciliation and merging pipeline.
    Soto-Jimenez LM; Estrada K; Sanchez-Flores A
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2014; 14(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 24304318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated ensemble assembly and validation of microbial genomes.
    Koren S; Treangen TJ; Hill CM; Pop M; Phillippy AM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 May; 15():126. PubMed ID: 24884846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.