These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29244530)

  • 1. Establishing Measurement Equivalence Across Computer- and Paper-Based Tests of Spatial Cognition.
    Bailey SKT; Neigel AR; Dhanani LY; Sims VK
    Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):340-350. PubMed ID: 29244530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.
    Coons SJ; Gwaltney CJ; Hays RD; Lundy JJ; Sloan JA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Cella D; Basch E;
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):419-29. PubMed ID: 19900250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing Web-Based and Lab-Based Cognitive Assessment Using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery: A Within-Subjects Counterbalanced Study.
    Backx R; Skirrow C; Dente P; Barnett JH; Cormack FK
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e16792. PubMed ID: 32749999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Introducing a new age-and-cognition-sensitive measurement for assessing spatial orientation using a landmark-less virtual reality navigational task.
    Ranjbar Pouya O; Byagowi A; Kelly DM; Moussavi Z
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1406-1419. PubMed ID: 27156658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Innovative testing of spatial ability: interactive responding and the use of complex stimuli material.
    Jelínek M; Květon P; Vobořil D
    Cogn Process; 2015 Feb; 16(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 25362549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychometric equivalence of a paper-based and computerized (iPad) version of the Memory Orientation Screening Test (MOST®).
    Clionsky M; Clionsky E
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 24815733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of PC and iPad administrations of the Cogstate Brief Battery in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging: Assessing cross-modality equivalence of computerized neuropsychological tests.
    Stricker NH; Lundt ES; Edwards KK; Machulda MM; Kremers WK; Roberts RO; Knopman DS; Petersen RC; Mielke MM
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Aug; 33(6):1102-1126. PubMed ID: 30417735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cognitive neuroscience-based computerized battery for efficient measurement of individual differences: standardization and initial construct validation.
    Gur RC; Richard J; Hughett P; Calkins ME; Macy L; Bilker WB; Brensinger C; Gur RE
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Mar; 187(2):254-62. PubMed ID: 19945485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of linear, fixed-form computer-based testing versus traditional paper-and-pencil-format testing in veterinary medical education.
    Folk LC; March JZ; Hurst RD
    J Vet Med Educ; 2006; 33(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 17035224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between computer experience and computerized cognitive test performance among older adults.
    Fazeli PL; Ross LA; Vance DE; Ball K
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2013 May; 68(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 22929395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-retest reliability of psychological and neurobehavioral tests self-administered by computer.
    Campbell KA; Rohlman DS; Storzbach D; Binder LM; Anger WK; Kovera CA; Davis KL; Grossmann SJ
    Assessment; 1999 Mar; 6(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 9971880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil psychological instruments: implications for measures of negative affect.
    Schulenberg SE; Yutrzenka BA
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 1999 May; 31(2):315-21. PubMed ID: 10495816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of paper-and-pencil and computerized forms of Line Orientation and Enhanced Cued Recall Tests.
    Aşkar P; Altun A; Cangöz B; Cevik V; Kaya G; Türksoy H
    Psychol Rep; 2012 Apr; 110(2):383-96. PubMed ID: 22662393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial cognition through the keyhole: how studying a real-world domain can inform basic science--and vice versa.
    Keehner M
    Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Oct; 3(4):632-47. PubMed ID: 25164502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct current brain stimulation enhances navigation efficiency in individuals with low spatial sense of direction.
    Brunyé TT; Holmes A; Cantelon J; Eddy MD; Gardony AL; Mahoney CR; Taylor HA
    Neuroreport; 2014 Oct; 25(15):1175-9. PubMed ID: 25144391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of response format on cognitive reflection: Validating a two- and four-option multiple choice question version of the Cognitive Reflection Test.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2511-2522. PubMed ID: 29589333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex Differences in Mobility and Spatial Cognition: A Test of the Fertility and Parental Care Hypothesis in Northwestern Namibia.
    Vashro L; Padilla L; Cashdan E
    Hum Nat; 2016 Mar; 27(1):16-34. PubMed ID: 26577341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of age in women in visuo-spatial memory in reaching and navigation tasks with and without landmarks.
    Perrochon A; Mandigout S; Petruzzellis S; Soria Garcia N; Zaoui M; Berthoz A; Daviet JC
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Sep; 684():13-17. PubMed ID: 29966753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review.
    Gwaltney CJ; Shields AL; Shiffman S
    Value Health; 2008; 11(2):322-33. PubMed ID: 18380645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [An enquiry into the WILDE-Intelligence-Test (WIT): comparability of application of the paper-pencil-version vs. the computer based application -- an analysis based on data of the Leipzig Vocational Retraining Center].
    Bettinville A; Rabenberg H; Hänsgen KD
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2005 Aug; 44(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 16059842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.