These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29244723)

  • 1. An Online MFL Sensing Method for Steel Pipe Based on the Magnetic Guiding Effect.
    Wu J; Fang H; Huang X; Xia H; Kang Y; Tang C
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Dec; 17(12):. PubMed ID: 29244723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic Flux Leakage Sensing and Artificial Neural Network Pattern Recognition-Based Automated Damage Detection and Quantification for Wire Rope Non-Destructive Evaluation.
    Kim JW; Park S
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 29301294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanism of Magnetic Flux Leakage Detection Method Based on the Slotted Ferromagnetic Lift-Off Layer.
    Tang J; Wang R; Qiu G; Hu Y; Kang Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35591277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Lift-Off-Tolerant Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing Method for Drill Pipes at Wellhead.
    Wu J; Fang H; Li L; Wang J; Huang X; Kang Y; Sun Y; Tang C
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jan; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 28117721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic flux leakage defect size estimation method based on physics-informed neural network.
    Xiong Y; Liu S; Hou L; Zhou T
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2024 Jan; 382(2264):20220387. PubMed ID: 37980932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design and Optimization of an MFL Coil Sensor Apparatus Based on Numerical Survey.
    Azad A; Kim N
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 31717345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research on the Analytical Model of Improved Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal for the Local Stress Concentration Zone of Pipelines.
    Yang L; Zheng F; Huang P; Bai S; Su Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Review of Magnetic Flux Leakage Nondestructive Testing.
    Feng B; Wu J; Tu H; Tang J; Kang Y
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Oct; 15(20):. PubMed ID: 36295427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phase-Extraction-Based MFL Testing for Subsurface Defect in Ferromagnetic Steel Plate.
    Ma C; Liu Y; Shen C
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35591012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of an MFL Coil Sensor for Testing Pipes in Extreme Temperature Conditions.
    Sathappan N; Tokhi MO; Penaluna L; Zhao Z; Duan F; Shirkoohi G; Kaur A
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 33925906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defect Width Assessment Based on the Near-Field Magnetic Flux Leakage Method.
    Li E; Chen Y; Chen X; Wu J
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34450864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Sensor for Broken Wire Detection of Steel Wire Ropes Based on the Magnetic Concentrating Principle.
    Zhang Y; Jing L; Xu W; Zhan W; Tan J
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Aug; 19(17):. PubMed ID: 31480374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Study on the Impact of Pole Spacing on Magnetic Flux Leakage Detection under Oversaturated Magnetization.
    Liu W; Ren L; Tian G
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Aug; 24(16):. PubMed ID: 39204889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Size of a Defect in Reinforcing Steel Using Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) Measurements.
    Yousaf J; Harseno RW; Kee SH; Yee JJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jun; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 37420540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic leakage behavior assessment in pipeline stress-concentrated areas using improved force-magnetic coupling model.
    Huang P; Li Y; Zheng F; Yang L; Su Y; Ma L; Wang C; Dou J; Li Y; Qiu Z; Zhang X; Bai S
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2024 May; 95(5):. PubMed ID: 38717265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image Registration for Visualizing Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing under Different Orientations of Magnetization.
    Li S; Zhang J; Liu G; Chen N; Tian L; Bai L; Chen C
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Jan; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 36673307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative Study on MFL Signal of Pipeline Composite Defect Based on Improved Magnetic Charge Model.
    Liu B; Luo N; Feng G
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34068412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface and back-side defects identification combined with magnetic flux leakage and boundary magnetic perturbation.
    Ou Z; Han Z; Yang C; Dong S; Du D
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2022 Jun; 93(6):065006. PubMed ID: 35778000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic Charge Model for Leakage Signals from Surface Defects in Ferromagnetic Material.
    Li X; Sheng G; Meng Z; Qin F; Liu Z
    Materials (Basel); 2023 May; 16(10):. PubMed ID: 37241377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Theory and Application of Magnetic Flux Leakage Pipeline Detection.
    Shi Y; Zhang C; Li R; Cai M; Jia G
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Dec; 15(12):31036-55. PubMed ID: 26690435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.