These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29245079)

  • 1. What technologies do people engage with while driving and why?
    Parnell KJ; Stanton NA; Plant KL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():222-237. PubMed ID: 29245079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Creating the environment for driver distraction: A thematic framework of sociotechnical factors.
    Parnell KJ; Stanton NA; Plant KL
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():213-228. PubMed ID: 29409637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():67-77. PubMed ID: 28189943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distracted Driving, Visual Inattention, and Crash Risk Among Teenage Drivers.
    Gershon P; Sita KR; Zhu C; Ehsani JP; Klauer SG; Dingus TA; Simons-Morton BG
    Am J Prev Med; 2019 Apr; 56(4):494-500. PubMed ID: 30799162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Road safety and distraction, results from a responsibility case-control study among a sample of road users interviewed at the emergency room.
    Née M; Contrand B; Orriols L; Gil-Jardiné C; Galéra C; Lagarde E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():19-24. PubMed ID: 30300795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Child passengers and driver culpability in fatal crashes by driver gender.
    Maasalo I; Lehtonen E; Pekkanen J; Summala H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 26507116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of naturalistic driving videos of fleet services drivers to estimate driver error and potentially distracting behaviors as risk factors for rear-end versus angle crashes.
    Harland KK; Carney C; McGehee D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 26760293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
    Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hierarchical machine learning classification approach for secondary task identification from observed driving behavior data.
    Osman OA; Hajij M; Karbalaieali S; Ishak S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():274-281. PubMed ID: 30554059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving.
    Zeeb K; Buchner A; Schrauf M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jul; 92():230-9. PubMed ID: 27107472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation.
    Clark H; Feng J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():468-479. PubMed ID: 27686942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distracting behaviors among teenagers and young, middle-aged, and older adult drivers when driving without and with warnings from an integrated vehicle safety system.
    Kidd DG; Buonarosa ML
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():177-185. PubMed ID: 28454863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Driver distraction by digital billboards? Structural equation modeling based on naturalistic driving study data: A case study of Iran.
    Sheykhfard A; Haghighi F
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():1-8. PubMed ID: 32199552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Mate! I'm running 10 min late": An investigation into the self-regulation of mobile phone tasks while driving.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():134-142. PubMed ID: 30343165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What drives technology-based distractions? A structural equation model on social-psychological factors of technology-based driver distraction engagement.
    Chen HY; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jun; 91():166-74. PubMed ID: 26994371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of age on crash risk associated with driver distraction.
    Guo F; Klauer SG; Fang Y; Hankey JM; Antin JF; Perez MA; Lee SE; Dingus TA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 46(1):258-265. PubMed ID: 28338711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.