These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 292462)
21. Esthetic posterior restorations utilizing the double-inlay technique: a novel approach in esthetic dentistry. Hannig M; Schmeiser R Quintessence Int; 1997 Feb; 28(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 10332359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Geometric design method for occlusal outlines of complex class I and class II inlay cavities. Kikuchi M; Takahashi M; Takada Y Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(5):648-54. PubMed ID: 21946485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. Ozturk N; Aykent F J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques. Santos MJ; Bezerra RB J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Principles of "extended machining" in the Cerec machining process. Hehn S Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Oct; 2(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 11373733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data. Magne P Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Porcelain inlays as an amalgam substitute? A report on the experience after 5 years of clinical use]. Jäger K; Wirz J; Schmidli F Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(11):1344-52. PubMed ID: 2263939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Experimental studies on the reproducible precision of fit of ceramic inlays]. Hahn R Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Oct; 45(10):653-6. PubMed ID: 2269071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Studies on the adaptability of the porcelain inlay to the cavity with bevel preparation]. Amano Y; Kobayashi K; Takei T; Fukui K; Kizima M; Koyama M; Nakagawa T; Katayama I Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1981; 10(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 6758885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Cumulative effects of successive restorative procedures on anterior crown flexure: intact versus veneered incisors. Magne P; Douglas WH Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 11203907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays. Estafan D; Dussetschleger F; Agosta C; Reich S Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 15055635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Occlusal margin quality of Cerec-inlays several months after insertion]. Hofmann N; Klaiber B; Heners M Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 May; 45(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 2269111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Preparation design and considerations for direct posterior composite inlay/onlay restoration. Fligor J Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Aug; 20(7):413-9; quiz 420, 432. PubMed ID: 18807449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Posterior porcelain inlay: clinical procedures and laboratory technique. Fuzzi M; Bonfiglioli R; Di Febo G; Marin C; Caldari R; Tonelli MP Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1989; 9(4):274-87. PubMed ID: 2701099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The double-inlay technique: a new concept and improvement in design. Dailey B; Gateau P; Covo Dds L J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):624-7. PubMed ID: 11404764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]