189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29246558)
1. Public support for intergenerational oocyte donation in the United States.
Bortoletto P; Farland LV; Ginsburg ES; Goldman RH
Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):343-348.e1. PubMed ID: 29246558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Limitations on the compensation of gamete donors: a public opinion survey.
Lee MS; Farland LV; Missmer SA; Ginsburg ES
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jun; 107(6):1355-1363.e4. PubMed ID: 28390693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Public support in the United States for elective oocyte cryopreservation.
Lewis EI; Missmer SA; Farland LV; Ginsburg ES
Fertil Steril; 2016 Oct; 106(5):1183-1189. PubMed ID: 27473351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public perspectives on placing age limits on men and women seeking fertility treatment.
Lee MS; Farland LV; Thomas AM; Ginsburg ES
Fertil Steril; 2019 Mar; 111(3):497-504.e2. PubMed ID: 30611550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Socio-demographic and fertility-related characteristics and motivations of oocyte donors in eleven European countries.
Pennings G; de Mouzon J; Shenfield F; Ferraretti AP; Mardesic T; Ruiz A; Goossens V
Hum Reprod; 2014 May; 29(5):1076-89. PubMed ID: 24626802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring.
Miettinen A; Rotkirch A; Suikkari AM; Söderström-Anttila V
Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 34(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 30805634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors.
Söderström-Anttila V; Miettinen A; Rotkirch A; Nuojua-Huttunen S; Poranen AK; Sälevaara M; Suikkari AM
Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar; 31(3):597-606. PubMed ID: 26724795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. British women's attitudes towards oocyte donation: ethnic differences and altruism.
Purewal S; van den Akker OB
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Dec; 64(1-3):43-9. PubMed ID: 16427244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Donor oocytes are associated with preterm birth when compared to fresh autologous in vitro fertilization cycles in singleton pregnancies.
Dude AM; Yeh JS; Muasher SJ
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):660-5. PubMed ID: 27343953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Six years' experience in ovum donation using vitrified oocytes: report of cumulative outcomes, impact of storage time, and development of a predictive model for oocyte survival rate.
Cobo A; Garrido N; Pellicer A; Remohí J
Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1426-34.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26353081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Financial compensation of oocyte donors: an Ethics Committee opinion.
;
Fertil Steril; 2016 Dec; 106(7):e15-e19. PubMed ID: 28340933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fertility treatment for the transgender community: a public opinion study.
Goldman RH; Kaser DJ; Missmer SA; Farland LV; Scout ; Ashby RK; Ginsburg ES
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Nov; 34(11):1457-1467. PubMed ID: 28900753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [How is the Czech oocyte donor? The analysis of their profile].
Rumpíková T; Oborná I; Bělašková S; Rumpík D
Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(5):372-382. PubMed ID: 29020785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Attitudes and intention to donate oocytes for research.
Purewal S; van den Akker O
Fertil Steril; 2010 Mar; 93(4):1080-7. PubMed ID: 19135662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Survey of Public Opinion in the United States Regarding Uterine Transplantation.
Hariton E; Bortoletto P; Goldman RH; Farland LV; Ginsburg ES; Gargiulo AR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(6):980-985. PubMed ID: 29524724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation.
Kalfoglou AL; Geller G
Fertil Steril; 2000 Oct; 74(4):660-7. PubMed ID: 11020503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pregnancy rates in donor oocyte cycles compared to similar autologous in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 26,457 fresh cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Yeh JS; Steward RG; Dude AM; Shah AA; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
Fertil Steril; 2014 Aug; 102(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 24842672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons.
Yee S; Hitkari JA; Greenblatt EM
Hum Reprod; 2007 Jul; 22(7):2040-50. PubMed ID: 17507386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Emotional and Financial Experiences of Kidney Donors over the Past 50 Years: The RELIVE Study.
Jacobs CL; Gross CR; Messersmith EE; Hong BA; Gillespie BW; Hill-Callahan P; Taler SJ; Jowsey SG; Beebe TJ; Matas AJ; Odim J; Ibrahim HN;
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2015 Dec; 10(12):2221-31. PubMed ID: 26463883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
