These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29246587)

  • 21. Is there any relationship between adc values of diffusion-weighted imaging and the histopathological prognostic factors of invasive ductal carcinoma?
    Aydin H; Guner B; Esen Bostanci I; Bulut ZM; Aribas BK; Dogan L; Gulcelik MA
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 91(1084):20170705. PubMed ID: 29299933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multiple mathematical models of diffusion-weighted imaging for endometrial cancer characterization: Correlation with prognosis-related risk factors.
    Zhang Q; Ouyang H; Ye F; Chen S; Xie L; Zhao X; Yu X
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 130():109102. PubMed ID: 32673928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The ability of ADC measurements in the assessment of patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma based on three risk categories.
    Liu J; Yuan F; Wang S; Chen X; Ma F; Zhang G; Tian X
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Jan; 60(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 29667881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can diffusion-weighted imaging predict tumor grade and expression of Ki-67 in breast cancer? A multicenter analysis.
    Surov A; Clauser P; Chang YW; Li L; Martincich L; Partridge SC; Kim JY; Meyer HJ; Wienke A
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Jun; 20(1):58. PubMed ID: 29921323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer.
    Choi SY; Chang YW; Park HJ; Kim HJ; Hong SS; Seo DY
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e474-9. PubMed ID: 22128125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diffusion volume (DV) measurement in endometrial and cervical cancer: A new MRI parameter in the evaluation of the tumor grading and the risk classification.
    Mainenti PP; Pizzuti LM; Segreto S; Comerci M; Fronzo S; Romano F; Crisci V; Smaldone M; Laccetti E; Storto G; Alfano B; Maurea S; Salvatore M; Pace L
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):113-124. PubMed ID: 26724655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of Tamoxifen-Related Endometrial Changes in Premenopausal Female Patients With Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Abdel Razek AAK; Elkalla HMHR; Refky B; Elsergany A; Sakrana AA; Saleh G; Gadelhak BN
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(4):485-489. PubMed ID: 32558766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. MRI In rectal cancer: Correlations between MRI features and molecular markers Ki-67, HIF-1α, and VEGF.
    Meng X; Li H; Kong L; Zhao X; Huang Z; Zhao H; Zhu W; Li X; Yu J; Xing L
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 44(3):594-600. PubMed ID: 26919464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion weighted MRI in endometrial carcinoma-Relationship with local invasiveness.
    Cao K; Gao M; Sun YS; Li YL; Sun Y; Gao YN; Zhang XP
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1926-30. PubMed ID: 21592709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Apparent diffusion coefficient value reflects invasive and proliferative potential of bladder cancer.
    Kobayashi S; Koga F; Kajino K; Yoshita S; Ishii C; Tanaka H; Saito K; Masuda H; Fujii Y; Yamada T; Kihara K
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jan; 39(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 23589321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The value of T2 mapping for evaluating the pathological type, grade and depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma].
    Li SJ; Zhang ZX; Liu J; Wang WJ; Wang J; Zhang Y; Cheng JL
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2023 Aug; 45(8):673-680. PubMed ID: 37580272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Kim EJ; Kim SH; Park GE; Kang BJ; Song BJ; Kim YJ; Lee D; Ahn H; Kim I; Son YH; Grimm R
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1666-78. PubMed ID: 25919239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot predict molecular subtype and lymph node metastases in invasive breast cancer: a multicenter analysis.
    Surov A; Chang YW; Li L; Martincich L; Partridge SC; Kim JY; Wienke A
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1043. PubMed ID: 31690273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Construction and validation of a prediction model for preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression in endometrial cancer patients by apparent diffusion coefficient.
    Zhang M; Jing M; Li R; Cao Y; Zhang S; Guo Y
    Clin Radiol; 2024 Oct; 79(10):e1196-e1204. PubMed ID: 39129106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Apparent diffusion coefficient on 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and prognostic factors in breast cancer.
    De Felice C; Cipolla V; Guerrieri D; Santucci D; Musella A; Porfiri LM; Meggiorini ML
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 25118482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Endometrial cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with tumor grade, depth of myometrial invasion, and presence of lymph node metastases.
    Rechichi G; Galimberti S; Signorelli M; Franzesi CT; Perego P; Valsecchi MG; Sironi S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jul; 197(1):256-62. PubMed ID: 21701038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting lymphovascular invasion in invasive cervical cancer.
    Yang W; Qiang JW; Tian HP; Chen B; Wang AJ; Zhao JG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1771-1779. PubMed ID: 27859961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-dimensional turbo-spin-echo amide proton transfer-weighted and intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for type I endometrial carcinoma: Correlation with Ki-67 proliferation status.
    Li Y; Lin CY; Qi YF; Wang X; Chen B; Zhou HL; Ren J; Yang JJ; Xiang Y; He YL; Xue HD; Jin ZY
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 May; 78():18-24. PubMed ID: 33556484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
    Kitajima K; Yamano T; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Hirota S; Kawanaka Y; Miya M; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 27130054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Correlation between DCE-MRI quantitative perfusion histogram parameters, apparent diffusion coefficient and Ki-67 in different pathological types of lung cancer].
    Huang YN; Zhao ZH; Mao HJ; Yang JF; Wang T; Zhao L; Yang LM; Yu GM; Wang C
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 99(21):1645-1650. PubMed ID: 31189264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.