These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29246668)

  • 1. Editorial: Applying 'omics technologies in chemicals risk assessment.
    van Ravenzwaay B; Sauer UG; de Matos O; Poole A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 91 Suppl 1():S1-S2. PubMed ID: 29246668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The challenge of the application of 'omics technologies in chemicals risk assessment: Background and outlook.
    Sauer UG; Deferme L; Gribaldo L; Hackermüller J; Tralau T; van Ravenzwaay B; Yauk C; Poole A; Tong W; Gant TW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 91 Suppl 1():S14-S26. PubMed ID: 28927750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applying 'omics technologies in chemicals risk assessment: Report of an ECETOC workshop.
    Buesen R; Chorley BN; da Silva Lima B; Daston G; Deferme L; Ebbels T; Gant TW; Goetz A; Greally J; Gribaldo L; Hackermüller J; Hubesch B; Jennen D; Johnson K; Kanno J; Kauffmann HM; Laffont M; McMullen P; Meehan R; Pemberton M; Perdichizzi S; Piersma AH; Sauer UG; Schmidt K; Seitz H; Sumida K; Tollefsen KE; Tong W; Tralau T; van Ravenzwaay B; Weber RJM; Worth A; Yauk C; Poole A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 91 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3-S13. PubMed ID: 28958911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Toxicogenomics in hazard assessment of chemicals].
    Kostka G; Liszewska M; Urbanek-Olejnik K
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2010; 61(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 20839457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physiological modes of action across species and toxicants: the key to predictive ecotoxicology.
    Ashauer R; Jager T
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Jan; 20(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29090718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 15th International Symposium on Toxicity Assessment : new directions in ecotoxicology and meeting the challenges ahead.
    Au DW
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2011 Aug; 19(7):2463-4. PubMed ID: 22678546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Toxicogenomics as a tool for evaluation of chemical effects].
    Watanabe H
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2007 Dec; 127(12):1967-74. PubMed ID: 18057786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncertainty factors in noncancer risk assessment.
    Dourson M
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Oct; 24(2 Pt 1):107. PubMed ID: 8933623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology.
    Fox DR
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2010 Feb; 73(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 19836077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advances in toxicological research and risk assessment.
    Lee BM; Kacew S
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2018; 81(9):240. PubMed ID: 29513644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. (Q)SARs to predict environmental toxicities: current status and future needs.
    Cronin MT
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2017 Mar; 19(3):213-220. PubMed ID: 28243641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Competing statistical methods for the fitting of normal species sensitivity distributions: recommendations for practitioners.
    Hickey GL; Craig PS
    Risk Anal; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1232-43. PubMed ID: 22050459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. More noise does not mean more precision: A review of Aldenberg and Rorije (2013).
    Fox DR
    Altern Lab Anim; 2015 Sep; 43(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 26375888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the application of loss functions in determining assessment factors for ecological risk.
    Hickey GL; Craig PS; Hart A
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 18691758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The future of human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals.
    Hodgson E
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2012; 112():307-22. PubMed ID: 22974745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Data Fusion Pipeline for Generating and Enriching Adverse Outcome Pathway Descriptions.
    Nymark P; Rieswijk L; Ehrhart F; Jeliazkova N; Tsiliki G; Sarimveis H; Evelo CT; Hongisto V; Kohonen P; Willighagen E; Grafström RC
    Toxicol Sci; 2018 Mar; 162(1):264-275. PubMed ID: 29149350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of category approaches, read-across and (Q)SAR: general considerations.
    Patlewicz G; Ball N; Booth ED; Hulzebos E; Zvinavashe E; Hennes C
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 67(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 23764304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The molecular basis of simple relationships between exposure concentration and toxic effects with time.
    Tennekes HA; Sánchez-Bayo F
    Toxicology; 2013 Jul; 309():39-51. PubMed ID: 23603429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Results of analysis of ratios of indices of toxic and sensory effect of chemicals].
    Novikov SM; Shashina TA
    Gig Sanit; 2013; (6):78-80. PubMed ID: 24624828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in the Application of "Omics" to Ecotoxicology and Stress Ecology.
    Ebner JN
    Genes (Basel); 2021 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 34680873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.