These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29247386)

  • 21. [Bayesian analysis. Basic and practical concepts for its interpretation and use].
    Rendón-Macías ME; Riojas-Garza A; Contreras-Estrada D; Martínez-Ezquerro JD
    Rev Alerg Mex; 2018; 65(3):285-298. PubMed ID: 30176207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bayes factor functions for reporting outcomes of hypothesis tests.
    Johnson VE; Pramanik S; Shudde R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Feb; 120(8):e2217331120. PubMed ID: 36780516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating Manifest Monotonicity Using Bayes Factors.
    Tijmstra J; Hoijtink H; Sijtsma K
    Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):880-96. PubMed ID: 26377889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Bayesian decision procedure for testing multiple hypotheses in DNA microarray experiments.
    Gómez-Villegas MA; Salazar I; Sanz L
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2014 Feb; 13(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24317791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Equivalent statistics and data interpretation.
    Francis G
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1524-1538. PubMed ID: 27743315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bayesian evaluation of constrained hypotheses on variances of multiple independent groups.
    Böing-Messing F; van Assen MALM; Hofman AD; Hoijtink H; Mulder J
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):262-287. PubMed ID: 28594225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simple Bayesian testing of scientific expectations in linear regression models.
    Mulder J; Olsson-Collentine A
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1117-1130. PubMed ID: 30903562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sequential hypothesis testing with Bayes factors: Efficiently testing mean differences.
    Schönbrodt FD; Wagenmakers EJ; Zehetleitner M; Perugini M
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):322-339. PubMed ID: 26651986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Properties of hypothesis testing techniques and (Bayesian) model selection for exploration-based and theory-based (order-restricted) hypotheses.
    Kuiper RM; Nederhoff T; Klugkist I
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):220-45. PubMed ID: 24975402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Statistical analysis of microarray data: a Bayesian approach.
    Gottardo R; Pannucci JA; Kuske CR; Brettin T
    Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):597-620. PubMed ID: 14557114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Deciding on Null Hypotheses using P-values or Bayesian alternatives: A simulation study.
    Ruiz-Ruano García AM; López Puga J
    Psicothema; 2018 Feb; 30(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 29363479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sample size determination for Bayesian ANOVAs with informative hypotheses.
    Fu Q; Moerbeek M; Hoijtink H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():947768. PubMed ID: 36483714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Tutorial on Computing Bayes Factors for Single-Subject Designs.
    de Vries RM; Hartogs BM; Morey RD
    Behav Ther; 2015 Nov; 46(6):809-23. PubMed ID: 26520223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using epistemic ratios to evaluate hypotheses: an imprecision penalty for imprecise hypotheses.
    Trafimow D
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2006 Nov; 132(4):431-62. PubMed ID: 18341235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. True and false positive rates for different criteria of evaluating statistical evidence from clinical trials.
    van Ravenzwaaij D; Ioannidis JPA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):218. PubMed ID: 31775644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bayesian sample size determination under hypothesis tests.
    Zhang X; Cutter G; Belin T
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 May; 32(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 21199689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How to test hypotheses if you must.
    Grieve AP
    Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 25641830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bayesian evaluation of inequality and equality constrained hypotheses for contingency tables.
    Klugkist I; Laudy O; Hoijtink H
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):281-99. PubMed ID: 20822253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Bayesian approach for sample size determination in method comparison studies.
    Yin K; Choudhary PK; Varghese D; Goodman SR
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2273-89. PubMed ID: 17979182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.